<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; w magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/w-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:28:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Conde Nast&#8217;s September: Ouch</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/conde-nasts-september-ouch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/conde-nasts-september-ouch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glamour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen vogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vanity fair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=338254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just after announcing it would bring in McKinsey &#38; Co. for some horrific cost-cutting, Conde Nast has released its official projections for its crucial September ad sales. We knew the numbers would be bad; they lived up to expectations.
This year Conde is not publishing its annual ad-heavy Fashion Rocks supplement, which itself significantly hurts ad [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/conde-nasts-september-ouch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bruce And Emma Willis&#8217; Newlywed S&amp;M Gift To All Of Us</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/06/bruce-and-emma-willis-newlywed-sm-gift-to-all-of-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/06/bruce-and-emma-willis-newlywed-sm-gift-to-all-of-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruce willis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emma wills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoshoots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[s&m]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=335327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bruce Willis, 54, and his new wife, model Emma, 32, recently did a sexy-pex S&#38;M nudie pictorial for W magazine. Here are some pictures! (Two might not be SFW).
The essential crux of this photo shoot is this: Actors and models are weird. Really. While photographer Steven Klein was shooting these, and a crew hung around [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/06/bruce-and-emma-willis-newlywed-sm-gift-to-all-of-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Reason Penelope Cruz Can&#8217;t Keep A Man: &#8216;When She Takes Off Her Blouse, It&#8217;s The Least Sexual Moment In History&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/the_real_reason_penelope_cruz_cant_keep_a_man_when_she_takes_off_her_blouse_its_the_least_sexual_moment_in_history-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/the_real_reason_penelope_cruz_cant_keep_a_man_when_she_takes_off_her_blouse_its_the_least_sexual_moment_in_history-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Molly Friedman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameron crowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameron diaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous and nasty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isabel croixet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javier bardem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matthew mcconaughey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penelope cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secret lives of women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vanilla sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woody allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/the_real_reason_penelope_cruz_cant_keep_a_man_when_she_takes_off_her_blouse_its_the_least_sexual_moment_in_history-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest issue of W, cover girl Penelope Cruz assures the reporter that she &#8220;never talk[s] about her private life to journalists&#8230;NEVER,&#8221; Of course, a few grafs above, the pretty little beard-candy spends much of the interview talking, in great detail, about the most private of private issues we didn&#8217;t even know we wanted [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/the_real_reason_penelope_cruz_cant_keep_a_man_when_she_takes_off_her_blouse_its_the_least_sexual_moment_in_history-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natalie Portman and Scarlett Johansson Don&#8217;t Do &#8216;Tarty Relationships,&#8217; Just Tarty Covers</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/02/natalie_portman_and_scarlett_johansson_dont_do_tarty_relationships_just_tarty_covers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/02/natalie_portman_and_scarlett_johansson_dont_do_tarty_relationships_just_tarty_covers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Defamer Hollywood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natalie portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebels forget their cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scarlett johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w magazine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/02/natalie_portman_and_scarlett_johansson_dont_do_tarty_relationships_just_tarty_covers-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Which of these things is not like the other? Hard to tell upon first glance at W&#8217;s S&#038;M-inspired, unisexy cover shoot featuring Boleyn girls Scarlett Johansson and Natalie Portman, both decked out in heavy kohl liner, slicked back hair, and matching not-in-the-mood-for-love glares. The punky dominatrix aesthetic is a far cry from their powder-faced Boleyn [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/02/natalie_portman_and_scarlett_johansson_dont_do_tarty_relationships_just_tarty_covers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
