<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; us weekly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/us-weekly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Celebrity Gossip Ad Infinitum: The Heidi Klum Birth Timeline</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/celebrity-gossip-ad-infinitum-the-heidi-klum-birth-timeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/celebrity-gossip-ad-infinitum-the-heidi-klum-birth-timeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moylan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity-industrial complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip cop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heidi klum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perez hilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us weekly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=346178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heidi Klum had a baby girl on Friday night. Congrats! Well, some gossip outlets shouldn&#8217;t be busting open the champagne, because while she was having the kid, they were fighting about whether or not she had it already.
That&#8217;s right, Heidi could have read that she gave birth of her daughter, Lou Sulola Samuels (why doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/celebrity-gossip-ad-infinitum-the-heidi-klum-birth-timeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heather Locklear&#8217;s 911 Call Placed by Concerned, Paparazzi-Friendly Former &#8216;Us Weekly&#8217; Staffer</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/10/heather_locklears_911_call_placed_by_concerned_paparazzifriendly_former_us_weekly_staffer-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/10/heather_locklears_911_call_placed_by_concerned_paparazzifriendly_former_us_weekly_staffer-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[911]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denise richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good samaritans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heather locklear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jill ishkanian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melrose place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paparazzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us weekly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/10/heather_locklears_911_call_placed_by_concerned_paparazzifriendly_former_us_weekly_staffer-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ newVideoPlayer("/911hl_def.flv", 506, 423,""); When we first heard about Heather Locklear&#8217;s weekend arrest for driving under the influence of a controlled substance, we were most interested in the curious detail of the sunglasses she repeatedly ran over. Turns out, the entire case is full of curious details, and here&#8217;s the biggest one: the witness who [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/10/heather_locklears_911_call_placed_by_concerned_paparazzifriendly_former_us_weekly_staffer-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Denise Richards&#8217; Cancellation: It&#8217;s Complicated</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/09/denise_richards_cancellation_its_complicated-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/09/denise_richards_cancellation_its_complicated-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charlie sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denise richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denise richards: it's complicated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[famewhore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us weekly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/09/denise_richards_cancellation_its_complicated-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#8217;t we almost have it all, America? Why, it was just a few weeks ago when we learned that E! had mercy-killed its celeb reality show Denise Richards: It&#8217;s Complicated, leading to cheers, emailed hugs, and exultant praise to God around the blogosphere. &#8220;Just when I think there&#8217;s no redeeming the entertainment industry as a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/09/denise_richards_cancellation_its_complicated-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/08/clothing_exchange_katie_holmes_isnt_simply_-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/08/clothing_exchange_katie_holmes_isnt_simply_-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Defamer Hollywood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katie holmes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots with human emotions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[splashpic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tom cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us weekly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/08/clothing_exchange_katie_holmes_isnt_simply_-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clothing Exchange! Katie Holmes isn&#8217;t simply a robot with human emotions &#8212; no, she&#8217;s also a style icon. Whether it&#8217;s her sunglasses, hairstyles, or leggings, she&#8217;s always been at the forefront of Scientologist chic&#8230;which is what made us question these baggy, rolled-up jeans she&#8217;s been sporting lately while rehearsing for her Broadway debut. Now, finally, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/08/clothing_exchange_katie_holmes_isnt_simply_-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What US Weekly&#8217;s List Of Star Virgins Reveals About Teenage Girls</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/08/what_us_weeklys_list_of_star_virgins_reveals_about_teenage_girls-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/08/what_us_weeklys_list_of_star_virgins_reveals_about_teenage_girls-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Defamer Hollywood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britney spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chastity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gary coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jessica simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jezebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[miley cyrus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selena gomez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the jonas brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virgins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/08/what_us_weeklys_list_of_star_virgins_reveals_about_teenage_girls-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Putting together a celebrity slideshow isn&#8217;t for the faint of heart: just ask our own Molly McAleer, whose titanic work in the pursuit of compilations could kill a lesser man (and has &#8212; don&#8217;t ask us about that intern in &#8216;06). So how do you survive filling out an eleven-page slideshow when your subject is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/08/what_us_weeklys_list_of_star_virgins_reveals_about_teenage_girls-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naomi Watts Is Kinda, Sort Of, Pretty Much Apparently Pregnant (Again)</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/naomi_watts_is_kinda_sort_of_pretty_much_apparently_pregnant_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/naomi_watts_is_kinda_sort_of_pretty_much_apparently_pregnant_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clem Bastow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celeb pregnancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liev schreiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maybe baby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naomi watts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us weekly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/naomi_watts_is_kinda_sort_of_pretty_much_apparently_pregnant_again.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Our&#8221; Naomi Watts is apparently expecting another child with her partner Liev Schreiber &#8211; I say &#8220;apparently&#8221; because the ever reliable Us Weekly has the &#8220;exclusive&#8221;, and any &#8220;exclusive&#8221; that doesn&#8217;t &#8220;exclusively&#8221; involve the words coming &#8220;exclusively&#8221; out of Naomi Watts&#8217; mouth is to be taken with a fairly large grain of salt.
So, &#8220;exclusively&#8221;, here&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/naomi_watts_is_kinda_sort_of_pretty_much_apparently_pregnant_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exclusive: Kirstie Alley&#8217;s Lawyers Demand That &#8216;US Weekly&#8217; Fire Writer Who Cracked A Scientology Joke</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/02/exclusive_kirstie_alleys_lawyers_demand_that_us_weekly_fire_writer_who_cracked_a_scientology_joke-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/02/exclusive_kirstie_alleys_lawyers_demand_that_us_weekly_fire_writer_who_cracked_a_scientology_joke-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Graham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jezebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kirstie alley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicole kidman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scientology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us weekly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/02/exclusive_kirstie_alleys_lawyers_demand_that_us_weekly_fire_writer_who_cracked_a_scientology_joke-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defamer just managed to get our grubby mitts on a secret copy of a strongly-worded letter that &#8220;Actress&#8221; Kirstie Alley&#8217;s legal team over at Goldman &#038; Kagon recently sent to US Weekly. In it, the firm asks that United States Weekly sever their relationship with fashionista/comedienne Danica Lo because of an innocuous Scientology joke she [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/02/exclusive_kirstie_alleys_lawyers_demand_that_us_weekly_fire_writer_who_cracked_a_scientology_joke-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
