<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tucker Max&#8217;s Movie: Poop</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/tucker-maxs-movie-poop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/tucker-maxs-movie-poop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sneak previews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tucker max]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=341638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I went and watched the upcoming Tucker Max movie, in full. I will tell you what I saw before I erase it from my mind entirely.
It was bad. It was really bad. It was not bad in the good way. It was not bad ironically. It was not bad in the &#8220;Let&#8217;s go [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/tucker-maxs-movie-poop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Inglourious Basterds Bad For Jews?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/is-inglourious-basterds-bad-for-jews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/is-inglourious-basterds-bad-for-jews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moylan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical reception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inglourious basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liel leibovitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quentin tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=341087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve read a lot of reviews of the new Tarantino movie, but our favourite so far came out today in Tablet. Basically it says the new movie would be better if Tarantino was Jewish.
In his astutely worded takedown of the movie, Liel Leibovitz says that Tarantino&#8217;s revisionist history&#8212;where Jewish soldiers kill Nazis and burn Hitler [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/is-inglourious-basterds-bad-for-jews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re Still Unsure: Is Inglourious Basterds Going To Suck?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/were-still-unsure-is-inglourious-basterds-going-to-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/were-still-unsure-is-inglourious-basterds-going-to-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moylan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical reception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inglourious basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quentin tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=340461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re Tarantino fans for sure, but a WWII movie about Nazi-killing Jews? We&#8217;re a little sceptical, and the critics aren&#8217;t helping our confusion.
The reviews are starting to come in and evidence is contradictory. On the positive side, Lisa Schwarzbaum from Entertainment Weekly gives it a B and says it&#8217;s, &#8220;cinematically dazzling, to be sure,   [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/were-still-unsure-is-inglourious-basterds-going-to-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Violently Does G.I. Joe Suck?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/how-violently-does-gi-joe-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/how-violently-does-gi-joe-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 15:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gi joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=339743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[G.I. Joe wasn&#8217;t screened for critics because Paramount wanted to market the movie to Middle Amerikkka without being judged. Critical reviews are finally coming in. They&#8217;re going to be bad, it&#8217;s just a matter of how bad. And how bad?
Roger Ebert says G.I. Joe wasn&#8217;t as bad as Transformers 2. But it still sucked ass:
 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/how-violently-does-gi-joe-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Gaga Is Better Than The Pussycat Dolls</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/05/lady-gaga-is-better-than-the-pussycat-dolls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/05/lady-gaga-is-better-than-the-pussycat-dolls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jess McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameron adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gigs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lady gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pussycat dolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=333850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herald Sun music guru Cameron Adams today published a review of the Lady Gaga/Pussycat Dolls show at Rod Laver Arena which informs us that Ms Gaga is much better live than the &#8220;herpes in a halter neck&#8221; gang. I think this is like saying it&#8217;s better to eat a bowl of vomit soup rather than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/05/lady-gaga-is-better-than-the-pussycat-dolls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Early Star Trek Rave</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/04/an-early-star-trek-rave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/04/an-early-star-trek-rave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 08:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cinema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=332476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Daily Mail took an early look at the new Star Trek prequel movie due out in May. &#8220;Effusive&#8221; does not quite describe the review:

 By far the best of the 11 Star Trek movies, it must rank as the outstanding prequel of all time&#8230;
The picture moves at a terrific pace, and is a satisfying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/04/an-early-star-trek-rave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Drones Get Reviewed By Pitchfork</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/03/the-drones-get-reviewed-by-pitchfork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/03/the-drones-get-reviewed-by-pitchfork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jess McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitchfork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=331757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you know what Pitchfork is? It is a magical website where music is reviewed within a decimal point of its life. If the review is good, bands try to mention this fact on the cover of their latest release by helpfully placing a sticker on the cover of the CD which quotes the review. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/03/the-drones-get-reviewed-by-pitchfork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watchmen Reviews: &#8216;Maybe It&#8217;s Better to Grow Up&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/03/iwatchmeni_reviews_maybe_its_better_to_grow_up-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/03/iwatchmeni_reviews_maybe_its_better_to_grow_up-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Defamer Hollywood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watchmen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/03/iwatchmeni_reviews_maybe_its_better_to_grow_up-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So how is this biggest-movie-ever Watchmen superhero flick? Well, not so good if many critics are to be believed. Should have been kept in holy reverence as a comic book (or graphic novel or whatever).

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/03/iwatchmeni_reviews_maybe_its_better_to_grow_up-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Watchmen&#8217; Review Shocker: Geeks Will Love It!</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/watchmen_review_shocker_geeks_will_love_it-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/watchmen_review_shocker_geeks_will_love_it-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watchmen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/watchmen_review_shocker_geeks_will_love_it-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While its writer denies he&#8217;s reviewed anything, the unofficial first take on Watchmen is live at Time. The verdict: It&#8217;s destined for fanboy greatness. Who knew?

Matt Selman insists he hasn&#8217;t breached Warner Bros.&#8217; review embargo on the film, which opens March 6 and is review-proof anyway. But even so, where hormonal sister publication EW yelped [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/watchmen_review_shocker_geeks_will_love_it-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost &#8216;Siskel and Ebert&#8217; Review Elevates &#8216;The Hills&#8217; to Ranks of the Critically Acclaimed</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/lost_siskel_and_ebert_review_elevates_the_hills_to_ranks_of_the_critically_acclaimed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/lost_siskel_and_ebert_review_elevates_the_hills_to_ranks_of_the_critically_acclaimed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene siskel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heidi montag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mtv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roger ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spencer pratt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the hills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/lost_siskel_and_ebert_review_elevates_the_hills_to_ranks_of_the_critically_acclaimed.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ newVideoPlayer("/ebertyt_def.flv", 506, 423,""); A memorial rummage through the Siskel and Ebert At the Movies archives over the weekend turned up a never-before-seen clip making their program&#8217;s recent dissolution all the more lamentable. To wit, behold the critical duo in their prime, debating the merits of the then fledgling MTV series The Hills. &#8220;The movie [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/07/lost_siskel_and_ebert_review_elevates_the_hills_to_ranks_of_the_critically_acclaimed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
