<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Kathy Lette Urges A Public &#8220;Girl-Cott&#8221; Of Male Authors</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/348391/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/348391/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jess McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kathy lette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishers weekly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordplay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=348391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[REET REET REET! It&#8217;s been a while since I&#8217;ve turned to Defamer Australia&#8217;s award winning Two Day Old News Desk™ team to break a story &#8211; well, at least not in an official capacity. So please make them (me? I am sort of confused right now) very welcome as they thoroughly investigate the fascinating world [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/348391/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conde Nast&#8217;s Big Bad Gamble</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/conde-nasts-big-bad-gamble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/conde-nasts-big-bad-gamble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the end]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=346898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year, Conde Nast hired McKinsey, folded several magazines, and instituted across-the-board budget cuts and layoffs. Clearly, the fancy days are over. Right? No, says the company. This is just a temporary blip.
In John Koblin&#8217;s weekly Conde Nast feature, company execs reveal a curious mindset (assuming it&#8217;s not just spin): McKinsey&#8217;s job was not to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/conde-nasts-big-bad-gamble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conde Nast&#8217;s Last Month Being Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conde-nasts-last-month-being-rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conde-nasts-last-month-being-rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative underclass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[luxury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=344867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weep, struggling members of the creative underclass, for your secret aspirations are drawing to a close: this may be the very last month of Conde Nast, Luxury Version. Coming soon: Conde Nast, Wailing Version.
Of course the creative underclass loves to hate on the creative overclass&#8212;embodied by Conde Nast&#8212;in public. But in private, everyone wants to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conde-nasts-last-month-being-rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conde Nast: 25% Cuts, Layoffs Loom. Except At The New Yorker!</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conde-nast-25-cuts-layoffs-loom-except-at-the-new-yorker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conde-nast-25-cuts-layoffs-loom-except-at-the-new-yorker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mckinsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print is dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumormonger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=344574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For weeks now, a scary number has been floating through the hallowed halls of Conde Nast: 25%. That&#8217;s how much the gossipmongers speculated McKinsey would chop the company&#8217;s budget. Evil rumours! Now it looks like that frightening number was correct.
With all those rumours, you knew it had to be accurate. More or less. John Koblin [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conde-nast-25-cuts-layoffs-loom-except-at-the-new-yorker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will The Weakest Survive At Conde Nast?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-the-weakest-survive-at-conde-nast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-the-weakest-survive-at-conde-nast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mckinsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=344253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conde Nast! Every scrap of news about it is precious, because everyone&#8217;s afraid that this McKinsey review is just an excuse to gut the once-fancy magazine empire. But! Conde&#8217;s weakest magazines might even make it through this alive.
Keith Kelly reports today that Teen Vogue, Allure, and Details&#8212;three of the company&#8217;s shakiest titles&#8212;will not be killed. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-the-weakest-survive-at-conde-nast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conspiracy Nuts Save Random House</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conspiracy-nuts-save-random-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conspiracy-nuts-save-random-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reprieves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=344143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nine short months ago, employees at Random House were silently urinating in their knickers after a new CEO seemed poised to drastically cut budgets. Now, they&#8217;re poppin bottles. What changed? Dan Brown!
We&#8217;ll try not to use too much insider publishing industry &#8220;lingo&#8221; as we break this down for you: Dan Brown is on Random House, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/conspiracy-nuts-save-random-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad, Big Books Keep Good People In Publishing Employed</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/bad-big-books-keep-good-people-in-publishing-employed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/bad-big-books-keep-good-people-in-publishing-employed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Snyder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depressing stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the lost symbol]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=344016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your sneers mean nothing: Dan Brown&#8217;s The Lost Symbol has already sold 1 million copies.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/bad-big-books-keep-good-people-in-publishing-employed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Dan Brown Day</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/happy-dan-brown-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/happy-dan-brown-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pareene</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dan brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[masons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington dc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=343899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hooray! Today you can finally buy Dan Brown&#8217;s The Lost Symbol, a new interactive novel about a heroic professor with a mullet who fights Catholics and Masons. It will save publishing, and ruin Washington DC.
The Lost Symbol (the book is named for the archaic graphemes found throughout the book&#8212;when decoded these &#8220;alphabetic letters&#8221; make up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/happy-dan-brown-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Inc. Folds Style &amp; Design</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/time-inc-folds-style-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/time-inc-folds-style-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[closures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=342811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No extra fashion ads to go around any more. Conde Nast folded its annual &#8220;Fashion Rocks&#8221; supplement months ago; now, Time Inc, is folding its quarterly fashion mag Style &#38; Design, just before Fashion Week. Four layoffs. Tough times. [NYP]
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/time-inc-folds-style-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julia Child, Recipes Ride Box Office Tide To Number One</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/julia-child-recipes-ride-box-office-tide-to-number-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/julia-child-recipes-ride-box-office-tide-to-number-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Belonsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julia child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nora ephron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=341286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The late, great Julia Child&#8217;s Mastering the Art of French Cooking, has been given a cinematic boost, thanks to Julie &#38; Julia. And she&#8217;s not alone.
According to Nielsen BookScan, Child&#8217;s classic recipe book, published nearly five decades ago, will take the number one slot on the New York Times Book Reviews&#8217; how-to best-seller list. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/julia-child-recipes-ride-box-office-tide-to-number-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
