<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; new york times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/new-york-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Did Avatar Cost Half A Billion Dollars As The NYT Claimed?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/did-avatar-cost-half-a-billion-dollars-as-the-nyt-claimed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/did-avatar-cost-half-a-billion-dollars-as-the-nyt-claimed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rushfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=348202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a new James Cameron movie appears, Hollywood&#8217;s industry watchers reach for their abacuses, first to tabulate the obscene amounts the film cost, and later, to add up the obscene amounts the movie makes.
The fun usually starts with a good argument about how much the movie cost in the first place. Back before Titanic launched [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/did-avatar-cost-half-a-billion-dollars-as-the-nyt-claimed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Can Think Of Several Hundred Million Other Reasons</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/we-can-think-of-several-hundred-million-other-reasons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/we-can-think-of-several-hundred-million-other-reasons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel Snyder</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken auletta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Auletta: Google feared buying the NYT would &#8220;sabotage their identity as a neutral search engine&#8221;.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/we-can-think-of-several-hundred-million-other-reasons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Newspaper Firewall Is Coming. And?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/the-great-newspaper-firewall-is-coming-and/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/the-great-newspaper-firewall-is-coming-and/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill keller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newsday is going to start charging for its awful website. One columnist there quit over it. The New York Times says it will make a decision on charging for its (good) website &#8220;within weeks&#8221;. Then what happens?
NYT editor Bill Keller told Clark Hoyt that the paper is &#8220;within weeks of a decision&#8221; on the long-discussed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/the-great-newspaper-firewall-is-coming-and/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Tablet Creates Uneasy Alliance Between Cupertino, The Press</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/apple-tablet-creates-uneasy-alliance-between-cupertino-the-press/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/apple-tablet-creates-uneasy-alliance-between-cupertino-the-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill keller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print is dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple needed music publishers to make the iPod a truly massive hit. Now Apple must work with its natural enemy&#8212;the press&#8212;to do the same for its forthcoming tablet. How painful.
Just witness the position Apple is in with the New York Times. After we pointed out that the Times editor had casually mentioned &#8220;the impending Apple [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/apple-tablet-creates-uneasy-alliance-between-cupertino-the-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Newspapers Are Wording Their Own Obituaries</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/how-newspapers-are-wording-their-own-obituaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/how-newspapers-are-wording-their-own-obituaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ephraim Gadsby</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper of record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print is dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[san francisco chronicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anyone else is weirded out by newspapers trying to dispassionately report news of their decline, look away now.
The US Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) released its figures today. And it&#8217;s bad. From April to September the average sales of 400 papers slipped 10.6 per cent from last year to 30.4 million. Each paper had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/how-newspapers-are-wording-their-own-obituaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hugh Hefner&#8217;s Old Penis Gets The Media Treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/hugh-hefners-old-penis-gets-the-sunday-media-treatment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/hugh-hefners-old-penis-gets-the-sunday-media-treatment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hugh hefner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media anatomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playboy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heh is the overwhelming sentiment one can read every time the New York Times gets cocky. And by cocky, I mean: talking about penises. In this instance, it&#8217;s talking about one of the oldest, most famous media penises still alive: Hugh Hefner&#8217;s. 
In an article that might as well begin &#8220;Long live the shriveled dick!&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/hugh-hefners-old-penis-gets-the-sunday-media-treatment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today In David Rohde&#8217;s Great Escape</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/today-in-david-rohdes-great-escape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/today-in-david-rohdes-great-escape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Cook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david rohde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidnapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paper of record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=346669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Part Two of New York Times reporter David Rohde&#8217;s account of his captivity by the Taliban, we learn two things: 1) The Taliban lies, and 2) it seems like the New York Times&#8216; public relations professionals lie, too.
We&#8217;ve been waiting a long time for Rohde&#8217;s first-person account of his ordeal&#8212;we found it very strange [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/today-in-david-rohdes-great-escape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT Reporter David Rohde And The Great Taliban Escape</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/nyt-reporter-david-rohde-and-the-great-taliban-escape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/nyt-reporter-david-rohde-and-the-great-taliban-escape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coming attractions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david rohde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=346583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York Times reporter David Rohde was held hostage by the Taliban for over seven months before he escaped. The Times coordinated a media blackout on the story to protect Rhode. Rohde&#8217;s publishing it in the Times. It&#8217;s pretty incredible.
Paging Paul Greengrass, your next project is here. The report&#8217;s going to file in six parts, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/nyt-reporter-david-rohde-and-the-great-taliban-escape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times : &#8216;We Are So Old&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/new-york-times-we-are-so-old/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/new-york-times-we-are-so-old/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back in the days]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cereal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=345399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charming ad in today&#8217;s NYT: a 100 year-old Times front page, with a Corn Flakes ad at the bottom. &#8216;Statue of Purity For Times Square,&#8217; says one typically laughable old-timey headline. How unlikely!
The elderly will &#8220;get a kick&#8221; out of this, while eating Corn Flakes.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/new-york-times-we-are-so-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex Will Be Sarah Jessica Parker&#8217;s Demise</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/sex-will-be-sarah-jessica-parkers-demise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/sex-will-be-sarah-jessica-parkers-demise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Belonsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[billy eichner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[britney spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dennis hopper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frank bruni]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gettypic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldie hawn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jon gosselin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[katy perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lily allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liza minnelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oliver hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phillip seymour hoffman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quentin tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[russell brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah jessica parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex and the city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simon cowell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suri cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tlc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=345251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Being a movie star&#8212;or motherhood&#8212;makes Sarah Jessica Parker look sleepy. TLC learns its Gosselin lesson. Quentin Tarantino loves sequels. And Katy Perry teaches us the power of tit-pics. TGIF, you attractive devils! It&#8217;s your gossip roundup!

A tired-looking Sarah Jessica Parker took her three children for a walk and, again, looked tired. So everyone says [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/sex-will-be-sarah-jessica-parkers-demise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
