<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; le journal erotique d&#8217;un bucheron</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/le-journal-erotique-dun-bucheron/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:27:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NYTimes.com May Be Too Good For Farting, But Not For Belgian Porn</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/06/nytimescom-may-be-too-good-for-farting-but-not-for-belgian-porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/06/nytimescom-may-be-too-good-for-farting-but-not-for-belgian-porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Cook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[le journal erotique d'un bucheron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=335118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times is too prissy to print the word fart on their classy website. But vintage Belgian porn? Mais oui, c&#8217;est l&#8217;art!
The Times redacted The Daily Show&#8217;s Jason Jones&#8217; use of the word fart in an online interview today about the Daily Show correspondent&#8217;s evisceration of the newspaper, choosing to replace it with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/06/nytimescom-may-be-too-good-for-farting-but-not-for-belgian-porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
