<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; journalismism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/journalismism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:06:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Four Ways Lists Make Us Immortal, According To Umberto Eco</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/four-ways-lists-make-us-immortal-according-to-umberto-eco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/four-ways-lists-make-us-immortal-according-to-umberto-eco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[listicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[umberto eco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=349127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Italian novelist Umberto Eco, the go-to intellectual for journalists worldwide, has deconstructed the human obsession with all things list-y. The bottom line for editors: Your listicles help readers brush off a terrifying universe of infinite chaos.
In this manner, the listicle is not a depressing instance of pandering but a nourishing expression of a natural and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/four-ways-lists-make-us-immortal-according-to-umberto-eco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Papers Find Facebook Status Too Risque To Print</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/papers-find-facebook-status-too-risque-to-print/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/papers-find-facebook-status-too-risque-to-print/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Somaiya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=348540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Post and the Times both covered this story, about a man accused of robbery whose alibi was a Facebook status update. Both papers though, censored the update itself, which was apparently &#8220;indecipherable&#8221;. Except it wasn&#8217;t.
The Times story, on The Local blog, opened with this:
 Where&#8217;s my pancakes, read Rodney Bradford&#8217;s Facebook page, in a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/papers-find-facebook-status-too-risque-to-print/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal Takes On Local News</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/wall-street-journal-takes-on-local-news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/wall-street-journal-takes-on-local-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 19:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rupert murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wsj]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal is planning to hire a dozen new staffers to cover local news in NYC, Media Decoder reports. Let us point out every last implication to this news!

Rupert Murdoch is still willing to pour money into the New York newspaper wars, &#8220;decline of the newspaper industry&#8221; be damned. He will not rest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/wall-street-journal-takes-on-local-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Newspaper Firewall Is Coming. And?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/the-great-newspaper-firewall-is-coming-and/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/the-great-newspaper-firewall-is-coming-and/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill keller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newsday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newsday is going to start charging for its awful website. One columnist there quit over it. The New York Times says it will make a decision on charging for its (good) website &#8220;within weeks&#8221;. Then what happens?
NYT editor Bill Keller told Clark Hoyt that the paper is &#8220;within weeks of a decision&#8221; on the long-discussed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/the-great-newspaper-firewall-is-coming-and/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Layoff Parade: Teen Vogue, Forbes, Time Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/the-layoff-parade-teen-vogue-forbes-time-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/the-layoff-parade-teen-vogue-forbes-time-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen vogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time inc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s dark media column, the layoff train is rollin&#8217; down the tracks that many magazines now regret installing in their offices.
Another Conde Nast mag lines up for its 25 per cent budget cuts: A tipster tells us that Teen Vogue had about six layoffs today in the sales and marketing departments, including, they say, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/the-layoff-parade-teen-vogue-forbes-time-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gigantic Seagull Stalks Aussie Newsman</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/gigantic-seagull-stalks-aussie-newsman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/gigantic-seagull-stalks-aussie-newsman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloopers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videuhoh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watch out!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=347007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Look out behind you, Australian newscaster Peter Hitchiner; it&#8217;s the world&#8217;s hugest f—king seagull. Right behind you. [Thanks, A.]
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/gigantic-seagull-stalks-aussie-newsman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Gourmet&#8217;s Death The Magazine Bottom?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/was-gourmets-death-the-magazine-bottom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/was-gourmets-death-the-magazine-bottom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gourmet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=345897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today&#8217;s media column: a sunny theory about Conde Nast, and the AP&#8217;s crazy scheme, for money. 
Econometric expert Daniel Gross speculates that Conde Nast&#8217;s closing of Gourmet may mark the bottom&#8212;the trough, if you will&#8212;of the bad times for the magazine industry. It&#8217;s an interesting piece. But I&#8217;d put my money on &#8220;when the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/was-gourmets-death-the-magazine-bottom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Magazine&#8217;s Product Of Year Doesn&#8217;t Actually Exist</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/magazines-product-of-year-doesnt-actually-exist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/magazines-product-of-year-doesnt-actually-exist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great moments in journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mike arrington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techcrunch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=345715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popular Mechanics just named TechCrunch publisher Mike Arrington&#8217;s tablet computer one of its top ten products of 2009. Which is amazing &#8212; amazingly ridiculous &#8212; given no one outside TechCrunch has even held one.
TechCrunch founder Mike Arrington has been working on his &#8220;CrunchPad&#8221; for more than a year now. TechCrunch posted a mockup of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/magazines-product-of-year-doesnt-actually-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumour: Layoffs At Reader&#8217;s Digest</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/rumour-layoffs-at-readers-digest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/rumour-layoffs-at-readers-digest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media crack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[readers digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumormonger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[village voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=345117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In your maudlin Wednesday media column: rumours of Reader&#8217;s Digest layoffs, a guarantee of Conde Nast layoffs, and the debate over the newspaper industry is one-sided, to be honest.
A tipster tells us that there have been &#8220;dozens&#8221; of layoffs at Reader&#8217;s Digest yesterday and today, possibly involving the outsourcing of the mag&#8217;s web department. [Related: [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/10/rumour-layoffs-at-readers-digest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When The Earth Stops Moving, What&#8217;s The Real Story?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/when-the-earth-stops-moving-whats-the-real-story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/when-the-earth-stops-moving-whats-the-real-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rushfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Small Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headline of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalismism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=345013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Courtesy of The Wrap.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/when-the-earth-stops-moving-whats-the-real-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
