<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/hollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ever Wonder Why Most Movies Suck?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/ever-wonder-why-most-movies-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/ever-wonder-why-most-movies-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Somaiya</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auteurs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soul destroying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=348820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Wikipedia user put together a list of the 50 highest grossing movies of the decade; only nine of them are not sequels or adaptations, The Wrap points out. And, at a generous estimate, only five are not terrible.
Frankly there is nothing I can say here, no series of bon mots, that will illuminate the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/ever-wonder-why-most-movies-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood Invents Celebrity Twittering For Dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/hollywood-invents-celebrity-twittering-for-dollars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/hollywood-invents-celebrity-twittering-for-dollars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Rushfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audrina patridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twittering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=348607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When show business spots a corner of public consciousness not colonised by product placement and paid endorsements, its experts spring to work to take care of that.
Twitter has been around for years already, but at last Hollywood has completed its exploitation project.
The Wrap reports that one brave company has now led the charge for celebrities [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/11/hollywood-invents-celebrity-twittering-for-dollars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Variety Lead Old Media Back To Pay Wall Ghetto?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-variety-lead-old-media-back-to-pay-wall-ghetto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-variety-lead-old-media-back-to-pay-wall-ghetto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Cook</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death of print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=344255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Variety, the Hollywood trade newspaper with its own secret language based on words like &#8220;ankle&#8221; and &#8220;boffo&#8221; into its copy, has confirmed that it plans to put most or all of its web site behind a paywall.
Nikke Finke broke the story (&#8221;TOLDJA!&#8221;) on Wednesday, but the paper has confirmed the rumour. (She also, incidentally, reported [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-variety-lead-old-media-back-to-pay-wall-ghetto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Veteran Hollywood Reporter Army Archerd, 87</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/veteran-hollywood-reporter-army-archerd-87/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/veteran-hollywood-reporter-army-archerd-87/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Belonsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annette benning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[army archerd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock hudson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warren beatty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=343164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Once upon a time, back when Hollywood-related media was relatively quaint, there was a man named Army Archerd. After covering the entertainment scene for the Associated Press, in 1956 he moved to Variety, where his column became a hit.
Archerd, a New Yorker, brought new vitality to entertainment reporting and penned, for decades, the &#8220;Daily [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/veteran-hollywood-reporter-army-archerd-87/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America, You&#8217;re To Blame For Hollywood&#8217;s Artistic Decline</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/america-youre-to-blame-for-hollywoods-artistic-decline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/america-youre-to-blame-for-hollywoods-artistic-decline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 06:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Belonsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remakes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=343015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Much hay has been made over Hollywood&#8217;s growing reliance on the remake. Creativity is dead, yes, we know, but, more importantly, the silver screen&#8217;s recycling kick also acts as an endorsement for mediocrity. And it&#8217;s all your fault!
Patrick Goldstein of the LA Times offers three reasons why remakes are all the rage. First, despite [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/america-youre-to-blame-for-hollywoods-artistic-decline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Schmidt&#8217;s Clumsy Hollywood Seduction</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/eric-schmidts-clumsy-hollywood-seduction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/eric-schmidts-clumsy-hollywood-seduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Tate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awkward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the cinema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=342405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Schmidt wants so badly for the cool kids in Hollywood to like him. The Google CEO bought that Southern California house. He tried and largely failed to get studio content on YouTube. Maybe if he offers the crown jewels?
The AdWords contextual advertising system on Google&#8217;s flagship search engine is responsible for the majority of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/eric-schmidts-clumsy-hollywood-seduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inglourious Basterds Won&#8217;t Save Weinsteins</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/inglorious-basterds-wont-save-weinsteins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/inglorious-basterds-wont-save-weinsteins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvey weinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inglourious basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weinstein co]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=341314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inglorious Basterds opened well! And since the flailing Weinstein Co. had mucho loot riding on this, they are saved! Right? No. Not really.
The movie cost $US65 million, with another $US35 million for marketing. The Weinsteins were goddamned determined to market the hell out of this! And that&#8217;s great and all. But the WSJ explains the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/inglorious-basterds-wont-save-weinsteins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here&#8217;s Your Jeremy Piven Mercury Level Update</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/heres-your-jeremy-piven-mercury-level-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/heres-your-jeremy-piven-mercury-level-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>the cajun boy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[douchebags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeremy piven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=341034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since Jeremy Piven almost died from eating sushi and had his corpse turned into a thermometer by David Mamet, the world has been wondering, &#8220;How are Piven&#8217;s mercury level doing like these day?&#8221; Well, now we know.
In a Q&#38;A for the new issue of Time, Rick Dorzback of River Edge, New Jersey asked the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/heres-your-jeremy-piven-mercury-level-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Summer Of Death For Movie Stars</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/the-summer-of-death-for-movie-stars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/the-summer-of-death-for-movie-stars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>the cajun boy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Big Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=341026</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s happened to America&#8217;s movie stars in the summer of 2009? A slew of boldface names have opened films this summer and most of them have tanked hard. Some people are blaming Twitter, but the answer is really quite simple.
Brooks Barnes has a piece in today&#8217;s New York Times pondering this very question. Barnes points [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/the-summer-of-death-for-movie-stars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Michael Jackson Documentary Coming On Halloween Weekend</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/new-michael-jackson-documentary-coming-on-halloween-weekend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/new-michael-jackson-documentary-coming-on-halloween-weekend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>the cajun boy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=339977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using more than 80 hours of footage captured during rehearsals for his ill-fated London concert series, Sony Pictures is set to release a Michael Jackson documentary in late October. Great.
This means that as the film&#8217;s release date (October 30) approaches, we&#8217;ll all be treated to more interviews with Jackson family members as well every bizarre [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/08/new-michael-jackson-documentary-coming-on-halloween-weekend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
