<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; gaffes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/gaffes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:35:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who Wants To Be A &#8216;Slumdog Millionaire&#8217; Distributor?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/who_wants_to_be_a_slumdog_millionaire_distributor-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/who_wants_to_be_a_slumdog_millionaire_distributor-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fox searchlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slumdog millionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner independent pictures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/who_wants_to_be_a_slumdog_millionaire_distributor-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though Warner Independent Pictures no longer exists, it&#8217;s comforting to know that WB&#8217;s deeply boneheaded decision to let Fox Searchlight snatch Slumdog Millionaire away is still immortalised on their website.




&#8220;Slumdog Millionaire,&#8221; Coming Soon From Warner Independent Pictures! [The Lost Boy]

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/who_wants_to_be_a_slumdog_millionaire_distributor-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl Porn Watchers Offered Ten Bucks As Hazard Pay</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/super_bowl_porn_watchers_offered_ten_bucks_as_hazard_pay-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/super_bowl_porn_watchers_offered_ten_bucks_as_hazard_pay-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/super_bowl_porn_watchers_offered_ten_bucks_as_hazard_pay-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We already thought that Super Bowl watchers in Tucson were the luckiest fans ever, what with the free porn that briefly graced their televisions. Now, they&#8217;re getting paid to have watched it.


E! brings word of Comcast&#8217;s attempt to smooth out what some might deem a problem, but what we would prefer to call a pleasant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/super_bowl_porn_watchers_offered_ten_bucks_as_hazard_pay-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Defamer Rates The Super Bowl Porn That Accidentally Aired In Arizona</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/defamer_rates_the_super_bowl_porn_that_accidentally_aired_in_arizona-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/defamer_rates_the_super_bowl_porn_that_accidentally_aired_in_arizona-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nsfw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bowl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/defamer_rates_the_super_bowl_porn_that_accidentally_aired_in_arizona-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, we&#8217;ve already told you what we thought of the movie trailers that aired during yesterday&#8217;s big game. However, what was our take on the 30-second, NSFW porn clip that accidentally played in Tuscon, Arizona?


Yes, Comcast subscribers in the fair Arizona burg were treated to a Super Bowl wardrobe malfunction in the waning moments of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/defamer_rates_the_super_bowl_porn_that_accidentally_aired_in_arizona-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS Now Just Taunting Macaulay Culkin, Defamer</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/12/cbs_now_just_taunting_macaulay_culkin_defamer-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/12/cbs_now_just_taunting_macaulay_culkin_defamer-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 21:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dakota culkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kcbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macaulay culkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/12/cbs_now_just_taunting_macaulay_culkin_defamer-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When we noticed today that CBS 2 had made a completely inappropriate photo choice for its story on the death of Macaulay Culkin&#8217;s sister, we figured they&#8217;d eventually change it. But is this an improvement?

The initial mugshot seemed to heavily imply Culkin&#8217;s responsibility for the death, and while the new picture removes some of that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/12/cbs_now_just_taunting_macaulay_culkin_defamer-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBS Uses Classy Photo Choice to Imply Macaulay Culkin Killed His Sister</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/12/cbs_uses_classy_photo_choice_to_imply_macaulay_culkin_killed_his_sister-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/12/cbs_uses_classy_photo_choice_to_imply_macaulay_culkin_killed_his_sister-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Buchanan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dakota culkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaffes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kcbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macaulay culkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/12/cbs_uses_classy_photo_choice_to_imply_macaulay_culkin_killed_his_sister-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let it never be said that we don&#8217;t understand the value of a click-through. But, uh, KCBS 2, can we talk for a sec?

Certainly, we can understand running with a picture of Macaulay Culkin to illustrate the death of his sister Dakota; after all, Macaulay is the most famous sibling and therefore the one that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/12/cbs_uses_classy_photo_choice_to_imply_macaulay_culkin_killed_his_sister-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
