<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/details/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:20:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Can Robert Pattenson Actually Have A Vagina Allergy?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2010/02/can-robert-pattenson-actually-have-a-vagina-allergy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2010/02/can-robert-pattenson-actually-have-a-vagina-allergy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Foster Kamer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lady business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mysteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert pattenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaginas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=356588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Pattinson did a steamy photo shoot with lots of hot, kinda nekkid models for basically gay straight lad-mag Details, in which he told his interviewer that he is &#8220;allergic to vagina.&#8221; Besides being an awesome pullquote, is it true?
Since we can&#8217;t get in touch with Pattinson&#8217;s allergist on a Sunday, there&#8217;s no way to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2010/02/can-robert-pattenson-actually-have-a-vagina-allergy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will The Weakest Survive At Conde Nast?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-the-weakest-survive-at-conde-nast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-the-weakest-survive-at-conde-nast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hamilton Nolan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mckinsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen vogue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=344253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conde Nast! Every scrap of news about it is precious, because everyone&#8217;s afraid that this McKinsey review is just an excuse to gut the once-fancy magazine empire. But! Conde&#8217;s weakest magazines might even make it through this alive.
Keith Kelly reports today that Teen Vogue, Allure, and Details&#8212;three of the company&#8217;s shakiest titles&#8212;will not be killed. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/09/will-the-weakest-survive-at-conde-nast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
