<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; critical drubbings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/tags/critical-drubbings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nicole Kidman A Terrible Actress? Say It Ain&#8217;t So, The Times!</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/11/nicole_kidman_a_terrible_actress_say_it_aint_so_the_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/11/nicole_kidman_a_terrible_actress_say_it_aint_so_the_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jess McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baz luhrmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical drubbings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicole kidman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/11/nicole_kidman_a_terrible_actress_say_it_aint_so_the_times.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baz Luhrmann&#8217;s Latest Epic TM Australia has finally premiered, and the reviews are trickling in!
Claire Sutherland from the Herald Sun loved it, calling it &#8220;a love letter to the Australian landscape and our history&#8221; and adding that &#8220;Australia has international blockbuster written all over it.&#8221; Meanwhile, over at The Age, Jim Schembri was somewhat less [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/11/nicole_kidman_a_terrible_actress_say_it_aint_so_the_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Official: American Critics Loathe The NBC Version Of Kath &amp; Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/10/its_official_american_critics_loathe_the_nbc_version_of_kath_kim/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/10/its_official_american_critics_loathe_the_nbc_version_of_kath_kim/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jess McGuire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[au]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical drubbings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kath and kim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reviews are in]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/10/its_official_american_critics_loathe_the_nbc_version_of_kath_kim.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We weren&#8217;t expecting Australian viewers to find anything lovable about the American remake of beloved ABC-turned-Channel Seven comedy Kath &#038; Kim, but the big question always remained &#8211; would NBC viewers actually dig a revamped and relocated version of the show? If the latest reviews are anything to go by, our American cousins are yelling [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/10/its_official_american_critics_loathe_the_nbc_version_of_kath_kim/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critics Insist &#8216;The Women&#8217; Sets Back Chick Flick&#8217;s Rights Several Hundred Years</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/09/critics_insist_the_women_sets_back_chick_flicks_rights_several_hundred_years-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/09/critics_insist_the_women_sets_back_chick_flicks_rights_several_hundred_years-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical drubbings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meg ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/09/critics_insist_the_women_sets_back_chick_flicks_rights_several_hundred_years-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s no good parts for women, the old Hollywood saying goes, and apparently that even holds true for a chick movie featuring only parts for women called, uh, The Women. Hitting theatres tomorrow, the updating of the 1939 classic hasn&#8217;t exactly electrified the critical community: Its current Rotten Tomatoes score&#8212;hovering there like a pair of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/09/critics_insist_the_women_sets_back_chick_flicks_rights_several_hundred_years-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
