<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defamer Australia &#187; STV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/author/stv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:56:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mariah Carey&#8217;s Moustache Still Not in Theatres Soon</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/mariah_careys_mustache_still_not_in_theatres_soon-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/mariah_careys_mustache_still_not_in_theatres_soon-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[push based on a novel by sapphire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/mariah_careys_mustache_still_not_in_theatres_soon-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More speculation today surrounds the whereabouts of Precious (nÃ©e Push: Based on a Novel by Sapphire), the celebrated, Benjamin Bratt-terrifying drama that won last month&#8217;s Sundance Film Festival before tumbling into bidding-war lawsuit limbo.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/mariah_careys_mustache_still_not_in_theatres_soon-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Watchmen Review-Proof?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/is_iwatchmeni_reviewproof-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/is_iwatchmeni_reviewproof-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paramount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner bros.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[watchmen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/is_iwatchmeni_reviewproof-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first batch of Watchmen reviews has arrived, drawing the geeks-vs.-trades divide into crisp, predictable relief. And while the critical haters are a minority, it&#8217;s their box-office forecasts that could most alarm its producers.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/is_iwatchmeni_reviewproof-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Studios Salvage Next Year&#8217;s Oscars?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/can_studios_salvage_next_years_oscars-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/can_studios_salvage_next_years_oscars-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[studios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/can_studios_salvage_next_years_oscars-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another year, another lacklustre awards-season showing for Hollywood studios. And while their art-house affiliates more than picked up the slack, could 2009 be the year the majors finally reclaim the Oscars for themselves?


Chatter has surfaced in recent years &#8212; specifically, since festival pickup Crash overtook Brokeback Mountain for Best Picture in 2005 &#8212; that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/can_studios_salvage_next_years_oscars-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harvey Weinstein&#8217;s Non-Comeback Comeback</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/harvey_weinsteins_noncomeback_comeback-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/harvey_weinsteins_noncomeback_comeback-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harvey weinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penelope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/harvey_weinsteins_noncomeback_comeback-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He lost a million-dollar bet, all but liquidated his company and endured a late, vicious backlash against a film that nobody even thought would reach the Oscars. And he won. That&#8217;s why he&#8217;s Harvey Weinstein.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/harvey_weinsteins_noncomeback_comeback-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drunkenness, Nakedness Sadly Not In Hugh Jackman&#8217;s Oscar Rehearsal</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/drunkenness_nakedness_sadly_not_in_hugh_jackmans_oscar_rehearsal-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/drunkenness_nakedness_sadly_not_in_hugh_jackmans_oscar_rehearsal-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 02:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hugh jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short ends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/drunkenness_nakedness_sadly_not_in_hugh_jackmans_oscar_rehearsal-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#183; After his shameless tease earlier today, Hugh Jackman appears in a new rehearsal video pledging class, dignity and pride in his Oscar-hosting duties. Colour us crushed. [via The Hot Blog]


&#183; 30-second ad spots on the final episode of ER &#8212; featuring George Clooney, Noah Wyle and Anthony Edwards &#8212; are going for the low, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/drunkenness_nakedness_sadly_not_in_hugh_jackmans_oscar_rehearsal-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Accurate Is The Leaked Oscar-Winner List?</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/how_accurate_is_the_leaked_oscarwinner_list-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/how_accurate_is_the_leaked_oscarwinner_list-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamer analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/how_accurate_is_the_leaked_oscarwinner_list-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As expected, the Academy steadfastly denies the legitimacy of that list of &#8220;leaked Oscar winners&#8221; currently making the rounds. But after rigorous analysis in Defamer&#8217;s Oscarology Labs, we&#8217;ve authenticated much more than you&#8217;d think.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/how_accurate_is_the_leaked_oscarwinner_list-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Super Bowl Director To Enliven Oscars With More Tackles, Bone-Crushing Hits</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/former_super_bowl_director_to_enliven_oscars_with_more_tackles_bonecrushing_hits-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/former_super_bowl_director_to_enliven_oscars_with_more_tackles_bonecrushing_hits-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larry mark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/former_super_bowl_director_to_enliven_oscars_with_more_tackles_bonecrushing_hits-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In what must be the last of the worst-guarded Top Secrets in Oscardom, we&#8217;re learning a little more today about the show&#8217;s new strategy behind the camera. Hint: The Academy is sending the blitz!


Patrick Goldstein is back on the Larry Mark beat today, spotlighting the rookie Oscar producer&#8217;s appeal to new awardscast director Roger Goodman. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/former_super_bowl_director_to_enliven_oscars_with_more_tackles_bonecrushing_hits-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today In Oscar Hell: Sir Laurence Olivier&#8217;s Acceptance-Speech Master Class</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/today_in_oscar_hell_sir_laurence_oliviers_acceptancespeech_master_class-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/today_in_oscar_hell_sir_laurence_oliviers_acceptancespeech_master_class-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laurence olivier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/today_in_oscar_hell_sir_laurence_oliviers_acceptancespeech_master_class-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#183; Sure, you&#8217;ll only have 45 seconds. But when you do finally get your Oscar, we&#8217;d appreciate a speech with even half the sincere class of Sir Laurence Olivier&#8217;s 1979 lifetime-achievement award acceptance (video after the jump). [via HE]

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/today_in_oscar_hell_sir_laurence_oliviers_acceptancespeech_master_class-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Threat Level Elevated As Kate Winslet Pressured By Underdog</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/oscar_threat_level_elevated_as_kate_winslet_pressured_by_underdog-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/oscar_threat_level_elevated_as_kate_winslet_pressured_by_underdog-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melissa leo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/oscar_threat_level_elevated_as_kate_winslet_pressured_by_underdog-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polls may be closed, but theories persist &#8212; crackpot and otherwise &#8212; about certain favourites&#8217; stability in their respective categories. Kate Winslet might be among those with reason to worry.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/oscar_threat_level_elevated_as_kate_winslet_pressured_by_underdog-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Slumdog&#8217; Wins Mumbai Street Equivalent Of Best Picture</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/slumdog_wins_mumbai_street_equivalent_of_best_picture-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/slumdog_wins_mumbai_street_equivalent_of_best_picture-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>STV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slumdog millionaire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/slumdog_wins_mumbai_street_equivalent_of_best_picture-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows what a couple of angry parents and Indian social activists think about Slumdog Millionaire&#8217;s march on the Oscars. But if a five-person, man-on-the street sampling is to be believed, Mumbai wants a victory.


But you&#8217;ve really got to want to believe it &#8212; that The Wrap had a correspondent on the street soliciting folks&#8217; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/02/slumdog_wins_mumbai_street_equivalent_of_best_picture-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
