Small Screen

Was ‘Angry Boys’ A Failure?

After grabbing the attention of an impressive 1.37 million Australians for the broadcast of episode one, ABC’s Angry Boys slowly but surely began bleeding viewers. Now that a couple of months have passed since its debut on our screens, tv writers are throwing around phrases like “ratings failure” – but WAS it actually a failure? Perhaps not, says SMH’s Karl Quinn.

Angry Boys is over at last, but while it left many viewers scratching their heads, it may not have been the ratings disaster it seemed. Wednesday night’s 12th and final episode was watched by 612,000 viewers, an improvement on the 465,000 who watched last week but still less than half the 1.37 million who watched the debut on May 11.

Oh no! But wait, here come the interesting figures/.

The ratings figures reported in mainstream media such as this paper are generally preliminary figures only, recording the audience in the five mainland capital cities as the program goes to air. That’s what the figures cited above refer to.

But the ratings collection agency OzTam also collects viewer information over the seven days that follow a program’s initial broadcast, and on this measure Angry Boys has performed extremely well, frequently drawing an additional 30 per cent more viewers. Last week’s episode, for instance, was watched by an extra 133,000 viewers over the next seven days (to yesterday), taking its total broadcast audience on ABC1 to 598,000. Angry Boys was also broadcast in repeat on ABC2 after the initial broadcast on ABC1. On average, these screenings attracted another 102,000 viewers.

In addition to that, the ABC claims 2.4 million people have watched the first 11 episodes of the series either on its iView online catch-up service or on the Angry Boys website. That’s an average 218,000 views per episode.

All that means that even without regional viewer figures – which can account for a third of total audience – the true figure for last week’s episode of Angry Boys is likely to be roughly double the 465,000 recorded in the overnight figures.

Which ought to cheer the ABC right up. Not that they seem overly upset by the performance of Angry Boys – I received an email from them yesterday excitedly stating the following.

Interest in the DVD and digital soundtrack release of Chris Lilley’s acclaimed 12-part ABC1 series Angry Boys has put it on target to become one of the most successful ABC product releases ever.

Pre-order sales for the 3-DVD set have already eclipsed those received for Chris Lilley’s previous series, Summer Heights High, prior to its release in 2007. And the official Angry Boys Soundtrack, which went on pre-sale last month, has already hit record numbers making it the most successful pre-order digital release by ABC Music. Both the DVD and the digital soundtrack are released nationally on Thursday, July 28.

The series has also proved a popular download on iTunes. To date, it is the most successful selling ABC product on iTunes since ABC began making its content available in 2008.

What did YOU think about Angry Boys? Did it live up to expectations?

MORE: Lilley boys Angry, but not too upset

Comments

1 2 3
  • jorge rodriguez

    Great series Chris, love Mum

  • Bob Meadows

    The ABC described “Angry Boys” as an “acclaimed series”? What a lot of rot. The only people who I have heard acclaim it are pimple-faced 15 year old youths. The show was completely bereft of any genuine humour, and was almost completely composed of juvenile toilet jokes, racial stereotypes and unfunny and totally predictable “Funny” scenes. Comedians repeat the “F” word over and over when they have nothing funny to say, as Lilley does in the show. Why on earth HBO in the US would want to purchase the series is beyond me – this type of “humour” won’t appeal to them. In summary, all the ABC hype before the series promised us much but all we got was a load of juvenile drivel.

    • ??

      Bob, have you ever watched American TV? The toilet humour of angry boys is the epitome of subtlety in comparison. It’s just a satirical TV show, if you don’t enjoy watching something then stop watching it and get over it.

    • Jack

      ’15 year old pimple faced youths’? Wow, with comedy writing skills like that, clearly Mr Lilley should have consulted you before writing his series.

      And possibly I Love Lucy reruns.

    • r3830

      Geeeeez Bob, it warms the cockles of my heart that you invested your valuable time into watching the twelve shows! Although, it is sad that you apparently got nothing out of it. My pimples faded out around 45 years ago by the way! HBO was probably interested due to the fact that it wasn’t a multi million dollar, over produced and complicated presentation. If you don’t like the use of the ‘F’ word – goodness – stay out of shopping centres!

  • Pat. Williams

    I emailed ABC about that dreadful series. Talk about glorifying all that’s bad with modern youth. For those wonderful young people whom I don’t include in the bad youth category, be proud of your achievements. Continue to dare to defy the likes on that despicable programme. That so many viewers apparently enjoyed the programme, I can say only that it shows the level people are prepared to go to. That level of disrespect is entertaining? Help.

    • Jonny

      Pat, I think the idea of social commentary via satire is lost on you.

    • bek

      Without wanting to offend, I must say anyone thinking Angry Boys ‘glorified’ the characters it portrayed is missing the point completely. First of all, this is a MOCKumentary, it must be considered in that light. Chris Lilley does satirical social observation; it is dark and coarse humour. I admit Lilley’s style is not for everyone, it is rough, vulgar even in its execution, but the underlying ideas and the series as a whole his style is astutely subtle. The subtext throughout the whole series is not glorification of the modern youth culture it depicts; in fact no character escapes critique, especially the younger ones and this is half the joke; the narcissism, self-centredness, the image the characters have of themselves. And when I refer to joke, this has nothing to do with glorification; those scenes are cringe worthy and if anything encourage the opposite. But that is not the only point. What I appreciate about Chris Lilley is exactly what I dislike about your comment regarding “bad youths”. The characters created by Lilley are not all exceptionally likeable, they do embody certain stereotypes, but the development of the characters goes beyond stereotypes. I myself came from a town like Dunt, went to an appalling public school, but I achieved 99.60 finishing school to study Combined Law with an excellent average. But that means nothing. What Lilley shows as the series goes on is what I learned myself growing up in a rough, socio-economically disadvantaged area and moving to Sydney to study among the most ‘educated’ and supposedly ‘good’: society’s stereotypes are useless. Many of the individuals that society stereotypes as ‘bad’ people have much good in them and equally many of the individuals that society stereotypes as the ‘good’ people have a lot of bad in them. Being a good person is not characterised by money, power, position, status, or even by a person’s use of the f…. word.

  • Abe

    It was only 12 episodes, i want more!lol

  • David

    Series was hilarious. Those that didn’t find it funny are either too old or the jokes just went right over their heads. Need a laugh track to tell you what’s funny?

    Go back to Big Bang Theory and the rest of the generic crap that’s on, and leave the quality programming to people that appreciate it.

  • Aristophrenia

    Even his first series, summer heights high was completely lifted from the New Zealand series 7 periods with Mr Cormsby. It beggars belief that he was not sued for plagiary.

    Go watch it, it is brilliant, and tell me its not lifted. Lilly is a hack. With so many talented young Australians being overlooked why do we have to keep resorting to our Johnny Youngs, Daryl Summers and Benny Hills of commedy. At least benny hill was good for his time.

    • Michael

      Summer Heights High was, in fact, his second series. We Can Be Heroes was his first.

      I agree with bek. I think there is a common misconception that Lilley’s stories are simply “comedy”. But they’re not. They’re so much more. His observation of stereotypes in society is amazing, and his attention to detail in his reconstruction of them is astounding. I think Lilley’s series are only funny because they represent “real” character types we can relate to. It’s like he’s showing us the real world from an outside perspective. We laugh at who we are, because in reality we are ridiculous.

      I think Angry Boys was the perfect series at the perfect time. All those people who thought it was simple comedy, can now see Lilley’s work for what it truly is.

  • Beck

    From a filmmaker and writers point of view this show is a masterpiece. It never claimed to be a humorous series, but more to the point a series with humor added into it. It was gorgeously written and I am glad it only went for 12 eps as too much of a good thing can get really boring. This show will be talked about for weeks to come and good or bad people are still talking. Congratulations Chris on a job well done. I can only hope you now spread your wings and inject some of that magical writing into our faltering film industry.

  • Susan

    Get a life Pat Williams. Chris Lilley is forthright, entertaining and basically is doing what George Orwell did in the 1930′s – showing parts of society and culture for what it actually is.

  • I watched them all. Watched them on iView. Great series that showed some serious points – it wasn’t a full on comedy, that’s not what it was meant to be. And I am not a youth either that other may claim wer the only ones that watched.

  • Sean

    Well done Chris, another triumph for Aussie humour. The naysaying wowsers have been wooed by the multimillion dollar budgets of foreign crud. The charisma and emotion exuding from each charater you protrayed was palpable and f****** funny. A job welldone

  • Mike Hunter

    Lilleys first two shows were GREAT but angry boys was just crap.

  • Scott M

    I never got into We Can Be Heroes, but loved Summer Heights High. Angry Boys took a couple of eps to get going, but I caught the final episode today on iView and had a tear in the eye as the credits rolled at the end.

    One of the things that annoyed me by the end of Summer Heights was that the two most awful characters in Jaime and Mr G never got their comeuppance. In Angry Boys the characters (Blake, S.mouse, even Daniel to an extent) had grown throughout the series and were less ‘angry’ by the end, while Jen Okazaki got her right whack. Tim grew without being angry in the first place. Also Gran’s influence on the boys seemed to make them less angry (why people would complain about swearing on a TV show called ‘Angry Boys’ baffles me…)

    The characters in this series went way beyond the stereotypes they were based on (except Jen), and were fully developed and realistic, which is what I think sucked me in. I rarely get sucked in, but I’m glad I stuck this one out. Plus it was funny.

  • alan fairley

    Putting on a wig and dress, and repetative swearing, does not make comedy nor does it indicate cleverness. It is just purile, childish and boring.

  • tlux

    I think with this series people saw Chris Lily for what he really is. His brand of ‘humour’ is just costumes and funny voices. Real comedians don’t need to play dress ups to get a laugh. His portrayal of stereotypes are not insightful at all. When a person tells me they like Chris Lily/Summer Heights High, i instantly know that im dealing with a person on a lower intellectual level. Just like people that like Michael Bay movies.

  • Bernt Porridge

    Angry Boys was a failure – some interest from all the blanket marketing but the product was woeful. Still, given the ABC’s record with misdirection, I reckon this sad series will be equally notorious as the unconvincing Brides of Christ fiasco from yonks ago. Neato dude scriptline just a poor imitation of real comedy.

  • Ken

    It was on the ABC which, by default, means I never saw a moment of it. Sounds like I didn’t miss anything – as usual.
    How the hell do they know how many people are watching anyway ? These ratings numbers are all guesswork.

  • Peter

    Whinging old people should go back to listening to talkback radio and leave the internet to ‘modern youth’.

  • Vic

    Cringeworthy, talent-free zone. I can’t even stand watching the promos.

  • davywavy

    I loved Angry Boys. I thought it was one of the most anarchic, subversive pieces of television I have seen in a long time cutting right through the sentimental fantasy of Australia that the media so actively presents.

  • Rod

    Anyone with any discerning taste would not watch this “penis and poo”joke crap. Typical of Aussie TV shows today;low on plot,big on sex,obviously catering for the lowest common denominator.Flicked over to ABC1 just in time to catch something about an ovulating female and how she thinks of nothing but sex in that other dreadful show:Crownies. Bouquets however to ABC for the brilliant Saturday night series: Marchlands.

  • Jon

    well done to the ABC, loved the series.

    Obviously, by some of the comments here, there are a few people who need to get a sense of humour or at least take the brush out of their A$%…

  • patterntangle

    It wasn’t laugh out loud but it was good, insightful, clever, satirical, ironic, and perverse.
    Maybe people want more 2 and Half men – Thanks Chris for providing something for the rest of us.

  • Melissa

    I absolutly love the series, me and most of my peers agree.
    I guess you just have to be young at heart to appreciate the series – no offence.
    The outstanding talent of Chris – who fully emersed himself into each character and I am really in ore of his talent!
    Every moment I spent watching his series so far has been a blessing as it made me so happy.

    -pleased viewer-

  • James

    Haters gonna hate. I thought it was his best series yet. can’t wait to see what he does next! new respect!

  • Lance d boyle

    It’s about time this “genius” was exposed ,he is a spoilt private school jerk who is using the same demeaning humour that he and his friends use on the less fortunate and all the other spoilt brats including the “intelligentsia” of the ABC still think it is funny.

1 2 3

Post Your Comments