A Lengthy Rant About Radio
WARNING – THESIS LENGTH BLOG ENTRY AHEAD. THOSE WHO COULD NOT BE LESS INTERESTED IN YOUR EDITORS THOUGHTS ABOUT RADIO ARE WARNED TO AVOID CLICKING ‘MORE’ AND INSTEAD WAIT FOR MORE VIDEOS OF JAPANESE GAME SHOWS FEATURING AMUSING CATS.
I guess before I begin this lengthy opinion piece about the state of Australian radio, I should declare for the record my own experiences in broadcasting. As far as community radio goes, I have hosted a weekly show on Melbourne’s 3RRR since 2006, I was a pop culture commentator on 3RRR and 2SER before that, and I also deliver my version of TV reviews on RRR’s Breakfasters program every Monday. I do a weekly segment on 720 ABC Perth’s Drive program, and from late 2006 until late last year I did mid-dawns and holiday fills (at reasonable hours!) on Triple J as well as appearing as a weekly guest on both Triple J’s Drive and Breakfast shows. In 2007 I worked as an online producer for 774 ABC Melbourne and had the privilege of working with some fantastic on air talent, some not-so-fantastic on air talent, and some truly brilliant producers. In addition to that, I’ve been interviewed on numerous commercial radio stations over the years. I’m telling you this because many years ago, I penned a rant about Australian radio solely from the perspective of a listener. Five years on, I think I’ve gained some valuable insight when it comes to how radio shows are put together, and my own experiences behind a microphone will undoubtedly have influenced my views, so it’s worth keeping all that in mind when you read the following.
While I proudly work for one of Australia’s finest community radio stations, I’d like to start off by saying I have nothing against commercial radio. No, really. Different strokes for different folks, and all that. I love decent pop music – and personally, I am particularly partial to the classic hits format of stations like Gold and WSFM – and I’ll even begrudgingly acknowledge that bands experiencing a massive wave of popularity with record buying teens like Short Stack need a home on the airwaves, so I’m absolutely fine with the existence of commercial radio. I just wish the commercial radio announcers weren’t so goddamn awful most of the time.
About five or so years ago when I was still living in Sydney, I was unfortunate enough to stumble across Kyle Sandilands and Jackie O’s Drive program (I’m not sure if they actually had a Drive program or if “highlights” of their show were being replayed in the afternoon, but either way I was most definitely heading home from work on a bus, so let’s move on). Kyle was questioning Jackie O about her first sexual experience. Evidently, Jackie O had lost her virginity on a park bench or something like that. But wait for it, cos here comes the twist! The whole time Jackie O was being “forced” to retell this story, Kyle had her mother on the line listening to the whole thing! AMAZING! HILARIOUS! YOU CAN SEE WHAT THEY DID THERE, CAN’T YOU?
I remember at the time thinking to myself “My god, do these people actually get paid to produce such indulgent, childish radio? Why won’t they stop talking and play some goddamn music?”
Choice is a wonderful thing, so I made the decision to change the station because clearly 2Day FM was going to make my ears bleed, and I don’t think I’ve listened to much of Austereo since. And as the years went on and more of Kyle and Jackie O’s on air antics made the papers, my decision to avoid Austereo like the plague was proven beyond all doubt to be a wise one. And I don’t just mean as a listener – there was a point where I was asked if I’d be interested in appearing on air as a gossip guru across the Austereo network by a very lovely woman who worked for them, and as much as the idea of making some decent and very easy money was appealing to someone like me who is so very hopeless when it comes to personal finances, I just couldn’t pursue the idea. As far as I’m concerned, “selling out” isn’t going to a commercial radio station – it’s taking the money and ignoring the fact you’re participating in something you don’t believe in and cannot be proud of.
While Kyle and Jackie O’s latest stunt is obviously the straw that broke the camels back as far as the public is concerned, these two have been making an absolute mint for an astoundingly long time by proudly and consistently delivering vile and nasty radio. And yeah, I’ll admit that the Kyle and Jackie O show rates well. But you know what? Channel Nine could broadcast footage of Bert Newton eating his own faeces and it’d probably rate well – does that mean they should do it? Do the number of idiots willing to bear witness to such a revolting thing justify the act of giving them the opportunity to do so? Course not.
You don’t have to cater to the lowest common denominator in order to grab the attention of a massive portion of the listening public. Look at Hamish and Andy – they continually pound their opposition in the ratings, and do you know why? Because they’re excellent talent, and that’s really all you need. I don’t know a single person who hears the names Hamish and Andy and immediately thinks “What total fuckheads”. Even the hippest of indie kids, the grubbiest of rock pigs, the most straight-laced parental types, likes them. They’re good blokes. They don’t rely on humiliating listeners and childish stunts in order to make a buck.
The same clearly cannot be said for the likes of Kyle Sandilands and Jackie O. And do you know why? Because the brutal truth is, they’re just not talented enough to engage audiences without the aid of ridiculous – and often cruel – pranks. They are not particularly funny or clever people, so they need to rely on revolting on air antics in order to keep their listeners entertained. And because they still delivered the all-important ratings, no one at Austereo ever stepped in and told them they’d gone too far.
But the trouble with producing this kind of radio is that as time goes on, you need to keep upping the ante. Your antics need to be more spectacular, more shocking, and more outrageous in order for your show to keep listeners – the listeners you’ve spent years dumbing down – interested. And eventually things keep escalating to the point where someone suggests strapping a fourteen year old girl to a lie detector machine in order to ask her about her sex life, and no one at the station stops it from happening. No one questions the wisdom of such an act, because everyone has gradually become desensitised through years of pushing – nay, bulldozing – the boundaries of good taste.
Most of the blame for Austereo’s latest woes has been laid squarely at Kyle Sandilands’ feet, with many people saying “Oh, Jackie tried to stop it. She stepped in and offered the girl counselling! She didn’t know what was going to happen, she’s the nice one!” What complete and utter bollocks. Jackie O has spent her entire radio career being a willing participant in precisely these kinds of acts, and just because she’s playing Good Cop to Kyle’s Bad Cop doesn’t make her an angel. If she had any credibility at all, she would have walked away years ago. Maybe she wasn’t the one to utter the immortal words “Right. And is that the only experience you’ve had?” to a teenage rape victim, but you’d better believe her hands are dirty after years of flailing about in the mud.
Last week, Nova breakfast host Meshell Laurie said on Twitter “I just passionately believe that commercial radio doesn’t have to be vile. It can be smart and creative if you give it a chance.” I couldn’t agree more. And now is the perfect chance for all broadcasters around the country to take a moment and reassess what they’re doing on air. Forget the money – are you proud of what you’re putting out into the world? Because if you even hesitate for a moment when answering, perhaps it’s time to look at ways to improve the quality of what you’re delivering to the listening audience. Everyone involved in the media has to take a certain amount of responsibility when it comes to what we offer up for public consumption. Instead of competing in order to attract the kinds of human beings willing to bear witness to the degradation of another for entertainment’s sake, we can lead by example and help shape the tastes of society through what we do.
I know that sounds incredibly pompous and self-righteous, but I hope you get what I’m saying. I’m not asking for Australian television and radio to become a land of rainbows and fluffy kittens (although has anyone actually pitched that show to Channel Seven?), I simply believe this country can produce clever, funny, and insightful programs for both mediums when we put our minds to it, and I’d like to see more of it.
I’d also like to add that as far as Defamer Australia goes… from the very early days of starting the site, I made a conscious decision to try and make this a place where pop culture and gossip junkies can get a fix without feeling dirty or cheap afterwards. I don’t always get it right – lord knows there are some things I’ve written about people over the years that I probably wouldn’t say now that I’m a little older and wiser – but my heart has always been in the right place. Perhaps at the expense of cheap hits, but whatever. I truly believe it’s possible to be entertaining and hopefully amusing without it being at the expense of another human being. At the very least, we owe it to ourselves to try.
THE END.

Comments
It’s wonderful to see someone acknowledging that whilst Kyle is a vile piece of work, he is not the sole culprit behind this program.
You rule. Great piece Jess. You say it all to a perfect cup of tea.
Bring back the talent. Piss off the LCD merchants!
Unforutnately that’s what you get when you create an uncontrollable monster coupled with a half-witted accomplice.
Problems stem from the top down, at Austereo. And the audiences are treated with contempt. Some audiences are too stupid to make correct decisions by choosing not to listen to such pap.
If there were no listeners, action would be taken (see what happened with the lovely Myf Warhurst and Pete Helliar in Melbourne. No ratings = gone. But also they weren’t given the best chance of success from the beginning with numerous production staff changes and poor leadership).
Bad behaviour is tolerated far too often and therefore it is almost celebrated. Putting young adults with little radio, life or legal nouse in charge of programs is dangerous. They don’t have the capacity to make tough or clever decisions. Sometimes the people in charge of them are equally incapable of providing guidance.
It’s about time the board of Austereo stopped worrying about revenue for five minutes and whether the sales conference up to Mt Hotham was boozy enough and look at what the company’s primary function is: Making Radio Programs. And get some people in who know how to run the joint.
Sadly the rats aren’t deserting this sinking ship, but it’s the good people who actually did want to make a difference.
Amanda, it sounds like you too have worked for the evil empire! Your point about the problems starting at the top are all too true. Kyle (who, despite his persona, is actually quite a nice chap) and Jackie are held up as the pinnacle of success in Austereo, as is demonstrated by the fact that their promotions are often replicated all over the country (the one with the relatives flying in from O/S is one example.) Kids who desparately want to be in radio start out wanting to work for 2Day, or Fox, or whatever equivalent of that they’ve grown up with in the country, and when they get there are told that they need to “push the envelope”, and that “there are thousands of people who would kill to do your job”, when/if they object to something. When management tell you that what Kyle and Jackie are doing is “cutting edge”, and it’s demonstrated that ratings are all that matter, how are they supposed to form any judgements otherwise? If the Commercial radio world is “normal” to you, it’s much harder to decide what is morally or ethically sound. Anyway, I could write about 7 pages on this, but my point is that unless the management and culture at the company changes, the same problems will continue to occur. Just like Heathers, if you cut off one head, another one will grow in it’s place. Fuck, it’s so depressing! :)
It’s good to see at least one good thing come out of the whole fiasco.
Great post, Jess. Honest and insightful and awesome.
Dear Jess,
Thanks for being rad, and honourable.
We love our keyboard kittehs too, but posts like this are insightful, honest and completely relevant.
Nice piece Jess. Freedom of Expression is a 2-way street and it’s reassuring to see people using their freedom to express their disgust at this tasteless duo !
I hear the names Hamish and Andy and immediately think “What total fuckheads”. There you go, now you know someone.
Hahaha, fair enough.
Also, you are such a sanctimonious twat. Why do all bloggers think their shit doesn’t stink? All you do is spend your days criticizing anything and everything. You’re pathetic.
dude, you suck at life.
Well obviously I suck at life if I don’t agree with you “rad and honourable” folk around here. Play me off Keyboard Cat! LOLZ!!!1
And yet you find posting a comment irresistible Chareth, so Jess’s job is done. Because regardless of Jess’s (honorable) decisions so far to not sell out but rather to keep her nose in community radio, she is employed by Gawker who are just as revenue-driven as Austereo.
As for Jess’s rant- good on you for posting it- my opinion of you just skyrocketed from it’s already nose-bleed-inducing height.
Oh, don’t get me wrong. I’m not at community radio because I don’t want to “sell out”. I just want to earn my stripes! It’s the best training ground ever, I get to pick my own music, and I have a killer time mucking about on air with some fantastic people. And I like the freedom Triple R allows me with my show. I haven’t got a burning desire to be heard by millions if I’m not saying anything of any importance, or if I am just back announcing someone else’s playlist. I’m certainly not trying to say I would never take a paying gig on radio, I love broadcasting and the idea of doing it for a living is appealing. I simply don’t want to do it YET – and certainly not at a place where I’d feel I was going against what I believe in just to make a buck.
Way to cover all bloggers with a blanket statement that barely applies to the author at which it was directed.
I APPARENTLY DISAGREE WITH YOU SO I WILL MAKE YOU FEEL BAD ABOUT YOURSELF. HAAHAHAHA!
I’ve been keeping a reserved opinion about this whole Kyle thing. I’m not sure if its entirely their fault. I mean, who didn’t do the research? Who withheld information from the production team? When I have answers to those questions, I’ll be willing to pass my judgments.
Radio itself, however, is in desperate need of upheaval. Worthwhile programs, as far as I’m concerned, appear to be few and far in-between.
Hey Bright Spark, your only contribution to a blog is to criticise the author for offering criticism, and you think the problem rests elsewhere? I am assuming that by referencing ‘all bloggers’ you are in fact including yourself, as the 29 words of mouth farts you offered us all in your second muse has only served to paint yourself as a paradox personified. A small tip – if it sounds like you are talking shit in your head, it’s good odds that it will be viewed that way when you move it to the public domain. I am all for free speech, but make it count if you have an opposing viewpoint as I feel dumber for reading what you just wrote.
Relax “Marto”.
Ahh, McGuire, I kinda agree with you -’though H&A are kinda fuckheads – but the bottom line (really – just look at the sponsors) is that noone other than the on-air folk & producers/backers have to listen; just turn away (Hi triplem. By participating in alternative media, we just need to trust that tides will turn, as is happening now; Sandilands aint the disease, he’s just a symptom (umm, my dicks’ dribbling). This kinda shit will always go on, but it needs oxygen, so let’s enjoy the silence -sometime it aint death, but it’s nearly as good.
Ah, Chareth such insightful, biting, social commentary. Perhaps you too should consider becoming a blogger.
I’m sure the world could benefit from more of your very original bon mots.
Bon mot? That ‘Word of the Day’ calendar is really starting to pay off!
Great piece Jess (incredible long even). I think you have perfect balance when it comes to writing about gossip etc without the nastiness. Takes brains to do that and still be witty and entertaining.
On another note, HOW AM I MEANT TO CONCENTRATE ON WHAT YOU HAVE WRITTEN WITH ALL THOSE SAD EYED, HOMELESS DOGS ON THE SIDE OF THE SCREEN? Please adopt them all immediately.
Chareth, you’re the kind of person who tries to iron the clothes on their body, or pours coffee on their vagina, scalding it, or, irons their vagina.
Clearly, you can’t read a warning.
You are the reason we aren’t allowed to have fun anymore.
I hope you are happy.
I see what you’re trying to do. Better luck next time buddy.
Well done Jess, I completely agree. The Kyle and Jackie O show makes my ears bleed.
In contrast, I have been coming to this website for almost a year now and have not once found anything even remotely offensive.
Love the site, loathe Kyle and Jackie O.
P.S. With any luck the brief Short Stack reference will trigger billions more fangirl visits and/or comments. Looking forward to it!
I must admit, I never listened to their show, I made the choice to listen to something else. But the fact that they were achieving high ratings means there were obviously many listeners, possibly even the majority, that enjoyed the show.
Unfortunately though, as is often the case, as soon as controversy rears it’s ugly head, the majority fall silent out of fear they will be brow-beaten by noisy do-gooders.
Too often these days people are quick to point the finger at public figures & the government to explain what is wrong with the youth of today. Yet this incident is a perfect example of where we as a community have gone wrong.
I can totally understand that Kyle & Jackie O would think that it was OK to proceed with this segment…after all, the girls mother was right there!!
This woman approached THEM to have her daughter on the show; it was HER who decided that her child would be exposed in this manner. Why is she not being torn to shreds in the media for her failure to do her job correctly??? She is supposed to be the one parenting this child…it is her that should be sacked for failing so dismally in her responsibilities to this girl; not the radio announcers that trusted her.
Thanks Jess. I was hoping you’d put up the rant. Worth waiting for.
see, this is why I have only ever looked at Perez Hilton the once.
He is one of those vile Sandilands/O types.
I read an interesting point somewhere else about this incident that’s worth sharing here.
The mother hooked up her daughter to a lie detector, then asked the questions with a smile on her face. Because the mother expected the daughter to admit her claims of rape were a lie. That’s why she did the whole segment in the first place, to prove to her denying self that the rape she was told about, possibly by someone close to the mother, didn’t happen, and her daughter had lied to her.
Wow GuanoLad – mother of the year just gets better and better.
D Gordon, regardless of the mothers actions in initiating this, somewhere along the line SOMEONE from that organisation should have said: We are dealing with a minor, this is immoral and repugnant, wee should protect her, someone ring DOCs. None of them did this so in my mind they are all culpable.
You only need to ask yourself the question, would I as an adult feel comfortable doing this? I bet the answer would be no.
COME ON PEOPLE. LET’S RAISE THE BAR!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJcZnKAH5Ss
Well done, Jess! A great piece and 100% true.
Chareth, your holier than thou attitude is really quite astonishing. Are you advocating what Kyle and Jackie O do?
Also, in regards to “bon mot”, sometimes people are actually smart and have a good vocabulary. Not everyone is a knuckle-dragging idiot like Kyle Sandilands.
hey Jess
respect to anybody that makes a stand
playing devils advocate would it be fair to say we are the designers of our own fate re-the puerile banalaties that permeate the commercial radio airwaves?
surely we have the ability to switch off?
do we blame alcohol for alcoholism or the vehicle for an ever increasing road toll?
if you choose to listen or partake in commercial radio activities, surely the fault is yours?
my 2 ducats worth.
this is, without a doubt, the best blog article I’ve read on this topic.
Marry me? (My girlfriend will be pissed that I’m asking, but we can worry about that later)
Jess that wasn’t as lengthy as I’d been led to believe – I didn’t even need a coffee break.
I’ve seen an estimate of at least 12 adults directly involved in putting that segment to air. And what responsibility does the broadcast licence holder have?
Do people such as D Thomas really believe that, because it was a parent who pimped their child for exploitation, the adult who takes up the offer is somehow excused? There have been a lot of comments along those lines posted in the past few days around the internet, and I’ve got a horrible feeling not all of them are sarcastic or trolling.
Great article on the subject, we can only hope (HA!) that Austereo etc listen and do something about the type of completely vile broadcasting that they do.
Im hoping that the recent overwhelming success of Masterchef hails a new attitude by broadcasters towards people. Instead of destructive ‘reality’ tv, we get something that encourages creativity and learning. Perhaps Austereo could have a big think about doing more in that direction.
Oh, and regarding Community Radio – I did it for ten years, enjoyed it greatly. Commercial – I lasted six months, hating every moment of it because of the people in the industry and their anything-for-fame attitudes. It doesn’t need to be like that. What a disappointment that the diversity, enthusiasm and creativity of community radio isn’t recognised.