Online

Who’s Abandoning Twitter?

Celebrity Twittering seems to be at an all-time high, which means it’s time to brace for the inevitable comedown, when the fickle famous give up microblogging forever. Oprah Winfrey, ever the trend setter, is leading the charge.

Arguably Twitter’s most famous adopter, Winfrey hasn’t posted to the service in more than a month. Her Twitter run lasted less than two months, but who can blame her? With a daytime talk show and magazine to run, a close connection to the White House and access to Broadway and Hollywood premiers and celebs, why bother with the banality of 140-character status updates?

Winfrey did just have a 10-day birthday cruise around the Mediterranean, but hardly explains her 33-day Twitter absence. It’s possible a long break could explain musician Dave Matthews’ 24-day Twitter absence, but what’s the point of a holiday if you can’t rub your friends’ virtual faces in all the fun you’re having, via Twitter?

At least Oprah and Matthews still have their accounts; US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton outright deleted hers sometime after October, when she was still on the celebrity Twitter lists. Like American Vice President Joe Biden, who hasn’t posted to his personal account since August, Clinton is now tracked by a mysterious, impersonal “UNOFFICIAL TWITTER.”

But of course, being on Twitter isn’t any of these people’s jobs. Not so with Jennifer Preston, the New York Times‘ Social Media Editor., who was called out this morning (by new-media zealot Jeff Jarvis, naturally) for going a full month without tweeting. Well, we kinda should have figured: Preston only recently unlocked her tweets, then promptly declared she’s be “listening more than tweeting,” while figuring out how to clamp down on tweeting by others.

But you can’t even pay some people to tweet, is the point!

(Top pic via)

Comments (AU Comments | US Comments)

  • raincoaster
    @raincoaster: Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, who swiped the paragraph breaks?
  • raincoaster
    If you look at Twitter user stats, Oprah is travelling a typical path. The only unusual thing is, she's famous, so everyone is watching. It's perfectly normal to start Twitter, do a lot the first day or first week, then let it drop off because you don't really see the point. Until you follow 60-100 people, the twitter stream is just not interesting enough, on average, to HAVE a point. It's not about how many Follow you, it's about how many you are actually reading throughout the day. MOST users sign on, try it for awhile, walk away, then go back to it because they NEED something, like to publicize an event or to find out news about a very current thing like an earthquake and they're frustrated with CNN. Dead typical. Oprah will be back, because she has to use the same account, because it's her actual name! She didnt' sign up as SkippyTheKlingon or whatever just to test it. Also, great article on the NYT social media guru, for whose job I will be applying, here: http://ow.ly/gSJL
  • jasonelias
    Wow Oprah, that's really thrilling! Yep, I'm glad she's taking a break.
  • probablynotcontagious
    Oprah simply hasn't paid the *right* person to tweet for her. I am currently funemployed, so tweeting about the joys of sweater capes and calypso music would be right up my alley.

    probablynotcontagious

  • EatMyKant
    @finwar: It sounds like we're fast becoming protonic-friends, ya know, no necking...

    EatMyKant

  • snugbug
    Not sure who's abandoning Twitter, but it looks like I for one shall henceforth be embracing it with great ardor. I’m signed up with Twitter yet never on it, since I’ve always failed to see the point of it all. Now I do: Unlike gawkering under Le Nouveau Regime, tweeting at least doesn’t demand the same level of commitment from me as training for a triathlon. On Twitter, there’s no need to wreck my brains to produce a pearl for the ages every time a topic engages me, edit my comments as carefully as I would my curriculum vitae, and shiver in my high-heels that I might get dis-gawkered whenever I hit "submit." To sum it up: I don’t need another blogging gig sans pay. I’ll stick it out at least through today, but if the fun factor gets squeezed out by all this new pressure, methinks I’ll switch to procrastinating on Facebook and Twitter pronto. THAT will teach you, the lot of you Gawker editors and fellow posters! PS: This is how terrified I am now: I typed up this comment in Word and ran a spell check before I cut it and pasted it here.

    snugbug

  • Presidentpez
    @twilt: Most of the new followers I've collected REALLY want me to see their nude pics, it seems disingenuous.

    Presidentpez

  • siliconvalleydropout
    no surprise with oprah
  • finwar
    @EatMyKant: Haha! Very funny! Yes I looked those up on wikipedia.

    finwar

  • Seamus Condron
    Actually, Mediabistro was the first outlet to take notice of it. Jeff Jarvis picked up on our tweet.

    Seamus Condron

  • EatMyKant
    @finwar: That was a pretty MACHO move, not WIMPy at all...

    EatMyKant

  • michaellamb
    man, poor thing's gotten big again (Oprah)
  • finwar
    So I got some followers to my twitter account, protondecay, where I make fun of other types of particles (for example... I think I used to be a Neutron... which kills by the way if you know anything about subatomic particles which, by the way, most people don't) only to find out that these followers are selling... crap! So, long story short... internet has crap on it. And I blocked those commercial venture twitter followers. Thanks for reading.

    finwar

  • KelseyElle
    I have abandoned twitter. I am not a celebrity, although I hope one of my twelve followers has been counting my days absent and subsequently tweeting about it.
  • joefuntime
    She must be hiking the Appalachian Trail!
  • TubOfHowardTaft
    Hmm, I suspect Gayle is the one who stopped tweeting for Oprah. I smell drama!

    TubOfHowardTaft

  • mattchew03

    I don't think it was actually Oprah twittering most of the time after the first day or two, anyway. For instance, on May 5 she put out several tweets related to the Time 100 gala, which she was attending, but all of them were made via "web." Something tells me that Oprah wasn't sitting there at an event like that with a MacBook on her lap, twittering away as John Legend performed. And even if she had used a BlackBerry/iPhone/whatever and accessed Twitter via the web and not an application, the tweets would be marked as coming from "mobile web."

    ...why do I care about this?

  • twilt

    Twitter has gotten too spammy too quicky.

  • Bellyboop
    I stick with comedians who have free throught, stream of conscious things to say. For those guys, Twitter is an outlet that keeps their funny muscle going and makes me laugh. I only follow the funny people...and TV bloggers. But I see a day when Twitter will be a bore and will go the way of MySpace.

Post Your Comments

Got something to say? There are two ways to comment:

1. Guests

Click here to comment instantly.

2. Facebook Users

Click below to comment using your Facebook account.

We're looking for comments that are interesting, substantial or highly amusing. If your comments are excessively self-promotional, obnoxious, or even worse, boring, you will be banned from commenting. All comments are moderated.