<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Jackson Versus Jarvis Cocker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:22:09 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: storeugle</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/comment-page-1/#comment-12619</link>
		<dc:creator>storeugle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=336672#comment-12619</guid>
		<description>@rebecca &amp; lolla - You are two very misinformed people. MJ was not a paedophile and was never hurting kids. You would do yourself a favour to read some trial-reporting on these allegations. The only reason the media could write about child-molestation allegations was due to the greedy, lowlife parents of the youngsters. Teenagers, the parent(s) thought nothing better of, than use for false statements. Do some fact-finding instead of leaning on sensationalism as a source, there are plenty of well-written articles to dispute your repetition on tabloid trash..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@rebecca &amp; lolla &#8211; You are two very misinformed people. MJ was not a paedophile and was never hurting kids. You would do yourself a favour to read some trial-reporting on these allegations. The only reason the media could write about child-molestation allegations was due to the greedy, lowlife parents of the youngsters. Teenagers, the parent(s) thought nothing better of, than use for false statements. Do some fact-finding instead of leaning on sensationalism as a source, there are plenty of well-written articles to dispute your repetition on tabloid trash..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/comment-page-1/#comment-8033</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=336672#comment-8033</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s disrespectful,FUCK JARVIS COCK AND THE WHITE RACE,you are jealous of Michael Jackson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s disrespectful,FUCK JARVIS COCK AND THE WHITE RACE,you are jealous of Michael Jackson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/comment-page-1/#comment-8032</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 18:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=336672#comment-8032</guid>
		<description>It wasn&#039;t about the molestation case and Michael Jackson is not a pedophile.

&quot;He was pretending to be Jesus - I&#039;m not religious but I think, as a performer myself, the idea of someone pretending to have the power of healing is just not right,&quot; Cocker said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#8217;t about the molestation case and Michael Jackson is not a pedophile.</p>
<p>&#8220;He was pretending to be Jesus &#8211; I&#8217;m not religious but I think, as a performer myself, the idea of someone pretending to have the power of healing is just not right,&#8221; Cocker said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MRRRR</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/comment-page-1/#comment-7630</link>
		<dc:creator>MRRRR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=336672#comment-7630</guid>
		<description>Jarvis acted like a pure coward, he wanted a bit of publicity. I prefer MJ or James Brown kitschy ways to Jarvis cocker indie snob ways! We dont need a self righteous Jarvis Cocker!how boring! how classless! and Im even not a MJ fans, but Jarvis dissappointed me there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jarvis acted like a pure coward, he wanted a bit of publicity. I prefer MJ or James Brown kitschy ways to Jarvis cocker indie snob ways! We dont need a self righteous Jarvis Cocker!how boring! how classless! and Im even not a MJ fans, but Jarvis dissappointed me there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/comment-page-1/#comment-7335</link>
		<dc:creator>rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=336672#comment-7335</guid>
		<description>jarvis did right in 1996

he acted on the courage of his convictions against a known pedophile surrounding himself with children

it was ridiculous for him to have been detained!

jarvis has never been charged with child molestation or dangled an infant out a window

go jarvis!

(wish he HAD mooned him!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jarvis did right in 1996</p>
<p>he acted on the courage of his convictions against a known pedophile surrounding himself with children</p>
<p>it was ridiculous for him to have been detained!</p>
<p>jarvis has never been charged with child molestation or dangled an infant out a window</p>
<p>go jarvis!</p>
<p>(wish he HAD mooned him!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/comment-page-1/#comment-6905</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=336672#comment-6905</guid>
		<description>Obv not suitable for parenthood

what a nasty thing to write, shame on you an you for posting in the first place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obv not suitable for parenthood</p>
<p>what a nasty thing to write, shame on you an you for posting in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acharis</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/comment-page-1/#comment-6904</link>
		<dc:creator>acharis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=336672#comment-6904</guid>
		<description>In NO WAY is this too soon! I thought this was one of the best things ever when I was younger (the fact that I was just getting into pulp at the time probably helped)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In NO WAY is this too soon! I thought this was one of the best things ever when I was younger (the fact that I was just getting into pulp at the time probably helped)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolla</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2009/07/michael-jackson-versus-jarvis-cocker/comment-page-1/#comment-6892</link>
		<dc:creator>lolla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/?p=336672#comment-6892</guid>
		<description>My absolute favourite awards moment ever. And the irony is they put the Jarv in jail for supposedly &#039;hurting kids&#039;. Know which one I&#039;d pick to babysit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My absolute favourite awards moment ever. And the irony is they put the Jarv in jail for supposedly &#8216;hurting kids&#8217;. Know which one I&#8217;d pick to babysit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
