Expert Declares Pauline Hanson Didn’t Get Naked For Saucy Photographs
Hmmm, is it wrong that I found news that a forensic anatomist has supported Pauline Hanson’s claims she is not the woman in the nude photos published by one of the Sunday papers over the weekend disappointing? Because I do.
A forensic anatomist has analysed the photographs claimed to be of a young and semi-naked Pauline Hanson and delivered this verdict: “It is not her.”
The young woman’s neck is too short, her eyes too close together and her nose too narrow to be Ms Hanson, says Meiya Sutisno, who worked on identifications in the Falconio murder case and the 2005 Bali bombings.
Did they get someone in who specialises in identifying corpses because the woman in the photo (and Pauline Hanson, coincidentally) has such dead, dead eyes?
Meiya Sutisno goes on to insult Pauline’s nose a lot – or at least that’s how I interpreted it.
- Next Post: Who Asked The Tow Company To Retrieve The Cocaine From Her Totaled Car? »
- « Previous Post: YouTube Clip Of The Day

Comments
I think she actually looks smokin hot!