The Critics Are Crazy About ‘Bride Wars’!

Remember when Eddie Murphy’s post-Dreamgirls Oscar fantasy died in the blast of the bomb that followed it? Anne Hathaway, we have found your Norbit.

With a small but symbolic cross-section of critics having reported at Rotten Tomatoes, Bride Wars has inspired the first — and what may prove the most vicious, depending on how that Towelhead sequel is coming along — beatdown of 2009. A sampling to date:

· “Kate Hudson and Anne Hathaway, who play the would-be brides, are good actors and quick-witted women, here playing characters at a level of intelligence approximating HAL 9000 after he has had his chips pulled.” — Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun-Times

· “Bride Wars pretends to be a satire of wedding mania, but since there’s virtually nothing else to the movie, the satire comes depressingly close to endorsement.” — Owen Gleiberman, Entertainment Weekly

· “A crass, despicably sexist piece of Hollywood trash.” — Josh Bell, Las Vegas Weekly

· “Will make you hate brides.” — Victoria Alexander, FilmsInReview.com

· “The most lamentable thing about the dismal Bride Wars is the total absence of fatalities.” — Nick Schager, Slant Magazine

Dammnnnn. The glass-half-full observer in us takes solace from that last, scorching rebuke from one of our ‘08 Listy winners, but the other half worries that Hathaway’s Best Actress Oscar hopes for Rachel Getting Married may find the bad-taste brick wall too tall to climb by late February. We hope we’re wrong, but if the wedding dress is the new fatsuit, here’s also hoping that lovely new Golden Globe will suffice.

• ‘Bride Wars’ [Rotten Tomatoes]