MGM Pours $US70 Million Into Making You Care About ‘Valkyrie’
Valkyrie is recovering reasonably well from the crippling stroke of bad publicity that nearly killed it earlier this year. But only part of that is due to slightly better-than-average word on the street.
MGM is paying dearly for the rest according to the NY Post, which reports today that the studio has spent $US70 million marketing the Tom Cruise thriller in advance of its Christmas opening. That’s about twice the average promotional budget for a studio opening expected to gross less than $US100 million, putting Valkyrie’s total cost at close to $US160 million. Remedial Hollywood math thus suggests that MGM and Cruise’s United Artists require at least a $US275 million theatrical gross to break even after exhibitors take their cut, which seems… unlikely, however much better the film is than we initially feared.
MGM tells the paper its spending is in line with the average, and the campaign will doubtless also trickle down to DVD and the studio’s waning output deal with Showtime. Still, for what UA takes from MGM’s coffers versus what it puts back, the Valkyrie returns hint that Cruise may yet have a $US15 million Sundance entry in his future just to even things out. More on Valkyrie — including pinpoint-accurate opening-gross predictions, as always — in tomorrow’s Defamer Attractions weekend preview.
- Doubling Down [NYP]
- Next Post: Britney’s Dad Given Court-Ordered Raise For Keeping Her Less Deliciously Insane »
- « Previous Post: ‘Sopranos’ Actor Lillo Brancato Jr. Acquitted Of Cop Killing
Comments (AU Comments | US Comments)
I am hearing good reviews about the movie despite the gossip. Please check out the new – http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081222/REVIEWS/812229989
Rogere Bert gives his facts about the movie a says quote Cruise is perfectly satisfactory, if not electrifying, in the leading role. I’m at a loss to explain the blizzard of negative advance buzz fired at him for the effrontery of playing a half-blind, one-armed Nazi hero. Two factors may be to blame: (a) Cruise has attracted so much publicity by some of his own behavior (using Oprah’s couch as a trampoline) that anything he does sincerely seems fair game for mockery, and (b) movie publicity is now driven by gossip, scandal and the eagerness of fanboys and girls to attract attention by posing as critics of movies they’ve almost certainly not seen. Now that the movie is here, the buzz is irrelevant, but may do residual damage.