It’s Official: American Critics Loathe The NBC Version Of Kath & Kim
We weren’t expecting Australian viewers to find anything lovable about the American remake of beloved ABC-turned-Channel Seven comedy Kath & Kim, but the big question always remained – would NBC viewers actually dig a revamped and relocated version of the show? If the latest reviews are anything to go by, our American cousins are yelling “DO NOT WANT” quite loudly at their television screens.
The American Kath and Kim has been savaged by critics as an embarrassment worthy of an apology to Australia.
Saucer of milk, table two!
Let’s take a look at the cutting commentary regarding the program, eh?
Television critic for the San Francisco Chronicle Tim Goodman was scathing in his review of the “jaw-droppingly awful” remake, asking if the American executive producer Michelle Nader had ever seen the “fantastically funny” Australian version.
Not good news for the wonderful Molly Shannon and the horribly miscast Selma Blair, but at least Tim Goodman has the good sense to realise the original product was a good egg.
News and Observer labelled the series “painfully close” to the worst sitcom on offer.
Oooh, big call! And from the country who make Charlie Sheen one of the highest paid sitcom actors thanks to his role on the brain abortion that is Two And A Half Men!
The Toledo Blade also advised readers to avoid the series, but critic Mike Kelly doubted if the premise could ever be funny, even in Australia.
“The series (…) is a remake of a popular Australian comedy program, but if stuff like this is considered funny Down Under, folks there probably think that Mel Gibson, Russell Crowe, and Hugh Jackman would make a terrific lineup for an updated version of the Three Stooges,” Kelly wrote.
Whoaaaaaaaaaaaaa there, Mike – don’t be slandering our fine country with hideously stereotypical insults just because your nation can’t enjoy an acclaimed program without giving it a local makeover before offering it up for televisual consumption to the general population!
“Of course, there’s always the chance that something major was lost in translation during the remake of the Aussie series.”
Yeah. Just a small chance.
They’ve even quoted (as Clem did a while back) the awesome Go Fug Yourself in the article.
Even celeb-watch blog Go Fug yourself got in on the act, declaring even the ads were enough to cause viewers pain.
“The promos for Kath and Kim that ran during the Olympics deeply stank. To the point where I think I felt actual, physical pain. I would shake my fist at the sky and ask why, GOD, WHY, so many talented people are involved in something so potentially awful,” the catty bloggers wrote.
All in all, three thumbs down, it would seem.
Which makes me long for Sunday night’s “fast tracked” Australian premiere so we can all sit and pass judgement for ourselves.
MORE:
Critics savage America’s Kath and Kim (Herald Sun)
Anticipation For US ‘Kath & Kim’ Reaches All-Time Low (Defamer Australia)
- Next Post: Madonna Bans Sarah Palin From Concerts; Republican Vice Presidential Candidate Unaware She’d Bought Tickets For Madonna’s Sticky and Sweet Tour »
- « Previous Post: YouTube Clip Of The Day

Comments
This is from The New Jersey TV critic Alan Sepinwall:
“It is as smug, airless and grating a half-hour as you can possibly spend, the kind of show that requires enormous reservoirs of willpower to avoid turning off. I’ll confess that I didn’t actually have that much willpower, and that I needed a pep talk from my wife (something about mortgage payments and health insurance) and, eventually, duct tape before I could be kept from using the remote.”
http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.ssf/2008/10/sepinwall_on_tv_kath_kim_teste.html
Ouch! I’m guessing two things: The humour and tone of the show does not translate at all or they have changed it around so much to “Americanize” it that they have forgot to make the characters ones that you want to actually watch.
Whatever. The critics can eat my poo. I liked the first episode. I even laughed. Out loud, no less. It’s not as bad as everyone says it is. Obviously it’s never going to be as good as ours but it does what it’s supposed to do – entertain. It just seems like everyone wants to hate on it because it’s cool to. Regardless of what you think of it, I think we should all remember that Gina Riley and Jane Turner are executive producers and over-saw the production of the whole thing, so if you want to blame someone, blame them. And Selma Blair is so NOT horribly miscast; she’s best part of the show.
Except for the Washington Post, which inexplicably loved it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/08/AR2008100803657.html