Roger Ebert, Wise Guy: Despite getting our hands on the damning outtakes of the critic’s recent Q&A explaining Creationism, we allowed for the possibility that the whole episode might have just been an elaborate, tongue-in-cheek statement about people’s eagerness to believe anything they see, hear or read. Right on cue, the crafty Ebert confirmed our suspicions late Tuesday in a finger-wagging ramble entitled This is the Dawning of the Age of Credulity: “Let’s go to work as perceptive readers. It might be a two-step process. [...] I expected better from evolutionists.” Funny — we expected better from a Pulitzer Prize-winning film critic. Anyway, Rog, we’re over it. How was Eagle Eye? [Chicago Sun-Times]

Comments (AU Comments | US Comments)

    There are currently no AU comments for this post.

Post Your Comments

Got something to say? There are two ways to comment:

1. Guests

Click here to comment instantly.

2. Facebook Users

Click below to comment using your Facebook account.

We're looking for comments that are interesting, substantial or highly amusing. If your comments are excessively self-promotional, obnoxious, or even worse, boring, you will be banned from commenting. All comments are moderated.