James Cameron Attempts To Explain The 'Avatar' Science Behind Blowing Your Freaking Minds
Posted by Seth at 4:00 AM on August 8, 2008
James Cameron's upcoming feature Avatar exists not merely to bring a motion-captured Michelle Rodriguez to a wider audience than ever before, but—if we are to believe what he tells us—to singlehandedly revolutionize the way we make, see, and even perceive of the movies. THR braved an interview with the director, who's too busy playing with his new toys to worry about losing his top-grossing-movie title to some gravel-voiced bat-creep. (Besides—by the time Avatar rolls around, the sweeping social revolution that accompanies it will render old notions of currency and spending completely obsolete. We'll be ranking the weekend box office in levels of Braincell Conversion Osmosis, or some other inconceivable economic unit of measurement.) But we digress; let's let Cameron describe some of the really-complicated-sounding rabbits he's got stuffed in his wizard hat:
Slated to open Dec. 18, 2009, the production already has been in the works for 2 1/2 years. When completed, Cameron expects "Avatar" to be about 60% CG animation, based on characters created using a newly developed performance capture-based process, and 40% live action, with a lot of VFX in the imagery.
"The way we developed the performance capture workflow on 'Avatar" is we have our virtual camera, which allows me to, in real time, hold a camera — it's really a monitor — in my hands and point it at the actors and see them as their CG chartacters," Cameron said.
The actors wear leotards and a "head rig" with a tiny standard-definition camera that takes an image of an actor's face. "That is going though facial algorithms and going back into the camera as a real-time CG face of the character," the helmer said. "You see it talk; you see the eyes move. It is pretty phenomenal.
"It's this amazing ability to quickly conjure scenes and images and great fantasyscapes that is very visual. We call it 'director centric' because I can use the camera to block the actors," Cameron related."
While it's hard to really picture what these advancements mean for us—the People Who Want to See Shit Explode In Space—without getting a look at some actual footage, we hear what he's captured so far is pretty mind-boggling. (Then again, this is a James Cameron film, and we have yet to hear of any real-time, in-camera dialogue-improvement technologies coming down the pipeline.) We'll just assume we'll see Cameron at the 60% CG/40% live action 2009 Oscars, proudly accepting his trophy as a crowd of virtuastars from the past 80 years, both deceased and living, cheer on his extraordinary achievement.

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Wrapitup
Posted 4:43 AM 8/8/08
Hm. So are the Zemeckis/Lucas/Cameron/Pixar guys going to literally change the face of talent? Sure, this question has been done to death but at what point do actors become like vinyl records? Charmingly retro but obsolete.
Also while Cameron was an awesome writer-producer, after Titanic, the projects he's developed are dull and unimaginative.
Wrapitup
Losin_it
Posted 4:17 AM 8/8/08
With Michelle in this, they are going to need to CGI in a positive breathalyzer test in there at some point as well.
Losin_it
Cam/ron
Posted 4:12 AM 8/8/08
Didn't we already hear such CGI hype for the Final Fantasy movie that tanked eight years ago?
Cam/ron
Old No.7
Posted 4:10 AM 8/8/08
Dear James,
Try not to fuck this up with a lousy script, like Lucas.
kthxbye.
Old No.7
kahri
Posted 5:28 AM 8/8/08
Please don't f*ck up Avatar. Especially if the purpose is to show off your new tech. That's what Speed Racer was for.
kahri
Breadbowl
Posted 5:23 AM 8/8/08
"Avatar" will be to movies what the segway scooter is to transportation.
Breadbowl
Fry_Bread_Power
Posted 5:55 AM 8/8/08
@kahri: Your mention of Speed Racer just gave me horrible flashbacks of seeing it in the theater.
Yeah, that movie sucked.
Fry_Bread_Power
Tiger_Tanaka
Posted 5:51 AM 8/8/08
Blah, blah, blah. Watchmen, please.
Tiger_Tanaka
Fry_Bread_Power
Posted 6:55 AM 8/8/08
@kahri: :D
The flashbacks lead to the seizures and it always ends the same dreadful way: with a chimp battling ninjas in a hotel room.
Fry_Bread_Power
kahri
Posted 6:46 AM 8/8/08
@Fry_Bread_Power: flashbacks or seizures? ;p
kahri
kylo4
Posted 2:55 PM 9/8/08
I think you mean 2010 Oscars, unless they release it early (which despite many wanting most likely will not happen.)
I don't care much for the subject matter here but it's a James Cameron film, it's going to be pushing the technological boundary of film making. The effects in T2 which are now 16 years old still look amazing. The effects of the second Terminator when he gets shot and the bullet holes heal over never fail to amaze. "The Abyss", "Titanic" and it's $1.8 billion gross and 11 Oscar wins have cemented James Cameron in history. I'm enthused to see what he comes out with next.
kylo4