Is Fox Head Tom Rothman Dulling the Claws of 'Wolverine'?
Posted by Defamer Hollywood at 8:05 AM on August 21, 2008
If there's one important lesson that can be drawn from the blockbuster performance of Warner Bros.' The Dark Knight, it's that audiences aren't afraid of a comic-book movie that takes a walk on the dark, grim side. However, the same can't necessarily be said for Fox topper Tom Rothman (the bane of AICN) who greenlit two Fantastic Four movies, hired Brett Ratner to direct X3, and now is allegedly mucking with the X-Men spinoff Wolverine. Despite the fact that the gritty, Hugh Jackman-topped film was met with a giddy response at this year's Comic-Con, Jeff Wells says that Rothman is pressuring director Gavin Hood to make the movie more kid-friendly — and when Hood won't cave, Rothman is taking matters into his own hands:
There was/is a huge Wolverine set being recently used. I'm not even sure which lot it was built on, but the look or mood of the set is, according to a source who was told Hood's view of things, supposed to be on the dark, dinghy and somber side. I only know what I was told, but the basics are that Hood was away from the set for whatever reason (shooting something else, taking a day or two off), and when he returned to the big somber set he was shocked to find that it had been repainted top to bottom on Rothman's orders. The murky-scuzzy vibe was gone, and a brighter and less downish look had taken its place.
Perhaps Rothman has taken his fan letter from Steven Spielberg too much to heart, but a child-friendly Wolverine feels less "X" and more "Y?" Does this mean his bristly greeting of "Bub" will be redubbed "Buddy," or his iconic cigar will be replaced with a pixie stick? C'mon, Tom: Wolvie isn't meant for buoyant musical numbers — or don't you remember what happened last time?
- He Da Boss [Hollywood Elsewhere]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Juancho
Posted 8:18 AM 21/8/08
@Old No.7: and make a movie that was coherent and interesting? NEVER!
Juancho
Old No.7
Posted 8:14 AM 21/8/08
Why not use the set from the X2? You know, from when he has flashbacks?
Oh, I'm sorry... that would mean timeline/location continuity, and common sense.
Never mind.
Old No.7
TurdBlossom
Posted 10:03 AM 21/8/08
This does not bode well. Shit-damn-fuck-bugger-all.
TurdBlossom
ajn007
Posted 11:46 AM 21/8/08
Yeesh. I tried to read that link to AICN, but I think my eyes are just allergic to that whole damned website. I can never get past more than 3 or 4 paragraphs of their shit.
ajn007
Benovite
Posted 11:38 AM 21/8/08
And some of us were hoping for an R rated Wolverine movie.. well maybe it'll be a prettier movie.
Benovite
TheQuestion
Posted 12:15 AM 22/8/08
Just one more example of the corporate overlords screwing up the creative personnel's hard work. I can see it now, some nimrod's going to get it into his head that since Jackman's done the "song and dance man" bit, that should be incorporated into Wolverine.
TheQuestion
e.varden
Posted 2:09 AM 22/8/08
"WOLVERINE" is a female appellation. Justine, Christine, Evangeline, you stupid bag of grass.
Plus they're small, like badgers. And they stink big time.
Hardly a modddle for a scary "man".
- It's feisty, that's true, but there's no mystery that a simple .22 cal bullet amongst the eyes is a dispatch. As would be a kick in the gut with a steel-toed boot.
- Any echo of "wolf" in her name is totally misleading.
Good: Their fur makes wonderful non-frosting hood-fringes for parkas, in the Arctic.
Otherwise, they are like angry beavers. Rodents with attitude.
Bury it with the pesky gophers.
e.varden