Why You Don't Care About Eddie Murphy
Posted by Defamer Hollywood at 10:15 AM on July 15, 2008
We needed a little time today to digest our feelings after the miserable box-office showing of Meet Dave, whose free-fall over the weekend resulted in the ugliest opening of Eddie Murphy's career. Not having seen it, we have to assume that $5.1 million gross aside, the film is at least superior to Norbit (not to mention Vampire in Brooklyn, Pluto Nash and a sprinkling of other Murphy misfires over the years). We'd even venture to say it'll be better than Beverly Hills Cop IV, the PG-rated abomination to which Murphy and Brett Ratner are attached for Paramount. Certainly it's better than The Love Guru, whose own beleaguered comic icon Mike Myers had flowers and a thank-you note on Murphy's porch by sometime Sunday afternoon.
But the knives are out anyway, with at least one impassioned plea calling for Murphy's retirement and another damning rundown of 50 not-impressive films that had higher-grossing opening weekends than Meet Dave (which even our lowball estimate last Friday waaaay overshot). But the scope of the crash-and-burn — not to mention the relative quietude of the backlash — suggests a less-controversial denouement: Nobody cares about Eddie Murphy.
Which isn't to say Murphy is irrelevant. They're different phenomena. He's less than two years removed from his Oscar-nominated performance in Dreamgirls — a performance for which he was a 50-50 shot right up to the point when Rachel Weisz opened the envelope. And you don't need us to revive the rap that some argue kept him off the stage: A surly, studio-hating, tranny-whore-patronizing, Norbit-starring, paycheck-cashing boor. But one who, as junkie bandleader James "Thunder" Early, restored older viewers' faith in Murphy as a dynamic screen actor.
The fat suits and multiple personalities he'd adopted since Coming to America (bludgeoning the form to death in the Nutty Professor films and eventually Norbit) called greater attention to the range of his early comic work. As a throwback to Murphy's predatory live act — on TV, in concert and in movies — it was that much easier to see what culture had lost. It was even easier to see what replaced it: A crowd-pleaser for hire in an era when crowd-pleasers no longer transcend media. There can only be so many, and they can only last so long.
Considering Murphy's big-screen longevity — 26 years this December — his downturn signals anything but irrelevance. More than any recent bust by Myers or Jim Carrey, Meet Dave's disastrous showing owes less to Murphy's presence than to Fox's miscalculation of what that presence means. This is important. The half of the so-called marketing quadrants that made Norbit a hit — men and women under 25 — weren't there to see Eddie Murphy. They were there for the Trick — the concept, the execution, the ease of it all, however crude, stupid and condescending. Basically, they were there for the movie part of it. They weren't yet born when Murphy was Murphy; they didn't know any mighty had fallen, nor from how far up.
Fox counted on that perspective, however, in foisting "Eddie Murphy in Eddie Murphy in Meet Dave" — even if Murphy was too far gone for our liking, he had proven reliable enough for a few of the studio's recent family romps. Right? Doctor Doolittle? Right? Maybe our kids would dig it, while we barely tolerated it for their sake, and, by summer dog-days extension, for our own.
Except "our" kids don't care. They've got better things to do. And we don't care that they don't care. And we don't care that the millions of others who don't care (their numbers reflect indirectly in Meet Dave's box-office trough) don't care either. All we feel is sort of a relief at no longer having to pretend to care — no more calling for Murphy's head or lamenting his choices. That it should happen to such a household name reinforces only its novelty, not its unlikelihood; actors are forgotten and disused all the time. Eddie Murphy's indelibility is his only entitlement; he's achieved that much, Oscar losses and all.
His value, though? His very place? Gone. And this is us, shrugging.

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
EuroDad
Posted 10:57 AM 15/7/08
wow - that was insightful; what the hell is it doing on Defamer?
EuroDad
Old No.7
Posted 10:46 AM 15/7/08
He's always got his singing career to fall back on.
Old No.7
Shumina
Posted 10:38 AM 15/7/08
Approximately where does the point of no return lie? Where is fame's event horizon, and has Eddie gone past that brink, leaving behind only a grossly stretched vision of who he was, arcing forevermore into the abyss of the forgotten?
Shumina
kookla
Posted 10:37 AM 15/7/08
@ShinySideUp: Billboards? The trailers were atrocious!
@randygbk: At this point, I'm like those looky-loos slowing down for a traffic accident...
kookla
randygbk
Posted 10:33 AM 15/7/08
Wow, only 1 other comment. Yeah, nobody cares. Nothing to see here, move along...
randygbk
ShinySideUp
Posted 10:29 AM 15/7/08
The billboards for this movie are/were horrific.
ShinySideUp
Barbarella
Posted 11:47 AM 15/7/08
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy... I *heart* schadenfreude.
Barbarella
Seriously
Posted 11:34 AM 15/7/08
I didn't care about Eddie Murphy, until I saw that picture and I remembered "Your royal penis is clean"
and then I started caring again
Seriously
MercuryPDX
Posted 11:26 AM 15/7/08
@Shumina: I can sum up where it was for me....
"Hot New Summer Blockbuster starring Eddie Murphy, Eddie Murphy, Eddie Murphy, Eddie Murphy, Eddie Murphy, Eddie Murphy, Eddie Murphy, Eddie Murphy, and some other actor."
Maybe if his films featured less of him and some other talent in there.... no... I still wouldn't go.
It's one of two things: Either he's got an Ego the size of Texas that's big enough to fill six roles in a movie that has nine roles total, or he's "difficult" to work with and no one WANTS to work with him... forcing him to play six characters in one movie.
Which is it?
MercuryPDX
Saxon 212
Posted 12:03 PM 15/7/08
I was so embarrassed for him when I saw the previews for the Miss thing in a head movie.
Saxon 212
readingisforkids
Posted 12:51 PM 15/7/08
I remember I got kicked out of the Apple store when they were filming this piece of nonsense. If I would have known it would be such a bust I would've put up more of a fight.
readingisforkids
Triborough
Posted 12:46 PM 15/7/08
I would have to say he peaked at Trading Places an everything has been downhill since. See you next Wednesday.
Triborough
LargeMarge
Posted 12:23 PM 15/7/08
Why is he making movies anyway? All his latest films have an air of "I don't give a fuck". He doesn't need the money. All the other big movie-stars just stop making the big commercial films after a while and focus on fewer projects that mean something to them - Julia Roberts comes to mind. If he's so pained to do these movies (and we are pained too), why does he keep doing them?
LargeMarge
jasonelias
Posted 1:10 PM 15/7/08
He's made a gang of insipid movies, regardless of the paydays its diminished his career. It's hard to care about an artist who's making Pluto Nash, I Spy,
Norbit, Holy Man--and oh god, I'm not even finished with the bad ones.
Murphy's seems so far from what made him great on SNL and his early stand-up that it's sad he can so willingly transmogrify into some bland, relentless bad movie machine. But still, it's not enough to make me have a passing interest in his career.
jasonelias
Pay_Me_Or_Pay_Me_No_Attention
Posted 1:51 PM 15/7/08
This is the karma you get when you're a Tranny murderer...
Pay_Me_Or_Pay_Me_No_Attention
randygbk
Posted 1:33 PM 15/7/08
The last decent movie Eddie starred in was Bowfinger. I'm sure Steve Martin's writing and antics were the main sell but Eddie did well in his two roles in it. 1999, a good year that I bet he'd like to go back to so he could branch off to an alternate universe where he avoided making the string of crap that followed.
randygbk
Losin_it
Posted 1:29 PM 15/7/08
Never mess with a Spice Girl.
Losin_it
pumpkinsoup
Posted 1:25 PM 15/7/08
There's always Shrek IV. I hear Mike Myers is looking for work.
pumpkinsoup
NoWireHangers
Posted 2:18 PM 15/7/08
Like I said earlier today, he's got talent. If he chooses the right films he can still put the defribulator paddles on the chest of his fat-suited career.
NoWireHangers
Tiger_Tanaka
Posted 2:35 PM 15/7/08
Brother Charlie is way funnier now. Bet he never thought that would happen. Standup, dude. It's better than putting your chips on Ratner.
Tiger_Tanaka
azoth
Posted 5:04 PM 15/7/08
@Shumina: "Where is fame's event horizon"
there is no such thing. witness john travolta, et all
azoth
YourGoldKeith
Posted 10:24 PM 15/7/08
If he really is irrelevant, let's, um, not mention it...
YourGoldKeith
TedCopacabana
Posted 11:23 PM 15/7/08
He should deny he was in Meet Dave and demand a DNA test to prove it.
TedCopacabana
Itsjustcatnip
Posted 11:19 PM 15/7/08
Any residue of class was wiped away during his Oscar snit.
Itsjustcatnip
Scout
Posted 12:57 AM 16/7/08
Meet Dave: Directed by Alan Smithee, Produced by Alan Smithee, Written by Alan Smithee,...
Scout
mothrafairy
Posted 1:13 AM 16/7/08
One or two dramatic roles have never been his essence. He's only ever been relevant when he's funny. He's no longer funny, therefore he's no longer relevant.
Few stand-up comics have made much of the Humble Stage Beginning/Film (or TV) Superstardom/Back-to-the-Stage career arc. Who really cared when Seinfeld, Roseanne Barr, etc. tried to amuse themselves by returning to vanity stage projects?
It's simple. Murphy can't possibly direct...so he must kill Sherri Sheppard and claim her seat on The View.
mothrafairy
CourageousCoward
Posted 1:48 AM 16/7/08
I don't care about Eddie Murphy because Eddie Murphy don't care about CourageousCoward!
CourageousCoward
jackvinyl
Posted 2:43 AM 16/7/08
i didn't go see this movie when it was called Inner Space ...
actually, i did and it had Martin Short who is abysmal.
jackvinyl
majikthise
Posted 3:10 AM 16/7/08
Inner Space was funny and Marty Short was funny in it. It's only since then that he has become unfunny. why do funny guys feel the need to don fat suits?
majikthise
sassypants
Posted 3:10 AM 16/7/08
@randygbk: I was just thinking the same thing. I will always keep a tiny place for him in my heart for that movie, at least for "keepittogether, keepittogether, keepittogether" alone.
sassypants
lrubemp
Posted 4:20 AM 16/7/08
No, Eddie's loaded with talent. What he lacks is any self-worth or sense of humanity. The hallmark of his career has been ridicule and degradation, never once rising above junior high school. Every minstrel eventually wears out the tune he's playing. Good riddance.
lrubemp
Edward Lionheart
Posted 7:19 AM 16/7/08
I read that he never acts with co-stars when it's their close-up--like the shot of the other person where you just see his shoulder. He leaves or goes back to his trailer; his time is too valuable. (They have to be there for him, though.) I don't know if other stars do this, but I've never heard of it recently. Everyone I know who has met or worked with him LOATHES him.
Edward Lionheart
lesbiansayswhat
Posted 7:37 AM 16/7/08
Even with all this..even with Norbit..never forget this man made 'Coming To America'. And for that we have given him a little room to make money off the masses. But there comes a point where we need to take him into a room and tell him to bring back Sexual Chocolate or go to hell:.
+ Watch video
lesbiansayswhat
rtisovec
Posted 8:57 AM 16/7/08
This movie makes me want to put my dirty feet all over Eddie's white couch ala Rick James.
rtisovec
Rob_Peter_to_Pay_Paultard
Posted 11:46 PM 18/7/08
@Old No.7: I was trying to block that out of mind.
Rob_Peter_to_Pay_Paultard
rachcornell
Posted 2:20 AM 16/7/08
Eddie is only seen on earth when he is on t.v. Does he think he is so great that he can hide from the world and come on when its time to film a movie? And then everyone will go running to the box office to see Eddies next great film. Sorry Ed but your going to have to work like the rest of the actors which includes showing your face in public not just films! And for god sake do some charity work!
rachcornell