'Twilight' Star's Hairy Chest Frightens The Tweens As Alan Ball Preps Hotter, Cooler Vampire Series
Posted by Molly Friedman at 6:30 AM on July 12, 2008
Like it or not, it's time to let go of any qualms you may have about welcoming a successor to Harry Potter's tween-bewitching throne and embrace what will surely become the zeitgeisty-est franchise of the decade. Twilight is here, it's a little bit queer, and don't even try ignoring it. The dewy, sexy, hickey-adorned film version of the hugely successful books centered around hot teenage vampires has begun garnering its first feature stories in the glossies, and the millions of "fan girls" obsessed with the tales are mad as hell and not gonna take it anymore. The new issue of EW features the film's two newbie stars on its cover, and the odd photo is setting message boards and fan sites ablaze with criticism from the series' longtime devotees. And angry fans aren't the only obstacle Twilight faces — too-cool-for-school Alan Ball has a vampire show premiering on HBO later this year and, unlike "powdered donut" Edward and "plain" Bella, his blood-suckers sit at the cool kids' table...

Both Twilight and True Blood have a very similar Romeo and Juliet-like couple at the centre of their story lines — as you (should!) know by now, Twilight's main focus is on the doomed romance between the impossibly gorgeous vampire Edward and nerdy mere mortal Bella, while TB stars equally titillating Stephen Moyer as the bad boy blood-luster and Anna Paquin as the frumpy waitress who falls for him. While Twilight lacks a single marquee name, Ball's show not only scored Paquin, but recently added Alexander Skarsgard to the cast, son of Swedish sexpot Stellan. And Alan Ball isn't afraid of letting his cockiness show — in an interview with THR's blog, the Six Feet Under vet and king of quirky cool dismissed all those other silly vampire shows (all of which, like Buffy, were far from flops) by saying, "I think it's pretty lame when you let your vampire go out during the day just because you don't want to shoot at night."
Plus, Ball has the advantage of debuting TB in September, while Twilight isn't scheduled to hit theatres until December. But we think Ball's balls are a wee bit heftier than they should be when it comes to giving competitors the finger. Even if EW got it all wrong by depicting Twilight's leads as pale, hairy, and "too seductive" for innocent tweenybops' taste, sex sells. And Paquin, adorable as she is, just can't compete with the nubile allure of Twilight's memorably sultry trailer when it comes to pitching trouser tents.

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
Jennifer
Posted July 12, 2008 11:07 PM
I really dont think Twilight has anything to worry about. The on screen chemsitry between Pattinson and Stewart is seriously hot. The magazine may have got the photo wrong but in the film itself the two leads are gorgeous together and Pattinson has got the character perfectl. I dont think Moyer has sufficient chemistry to carry off the role in the TV series.
Lauren
Posted July 13, 2008 10:07 AM
Twilight has nothing to worry about, its fan base is huge and includes more that just "fan girls", It includes guys and older women, so unless you've actually read the books and understand why us Twilighters actually pick at everything to do with the movie to bits, dont make a judgement.
Donny
Posted July 14, 2008 10:04 AM
I truly believe that Twilight will be a huge success. Pattinson and Stewart are taking chemestry to a whole new level. People who didn't read the books may not be able to understand its appealing but the ones who have they know for sure why they are so alluring
Suckmyblood
Posted July 14, 2008 4:32 PM
First let me start off by saying and I am sure there are plenty of others who feel the same as I do, but PLEASE comparing Kristen Stewart to what's her name from X-Men come on. And as far as this other guy even considering that he is more or even close to be as sexy and alluring as Robert Pattinson that is like comparing a Shiny Volvo to a beat up old Volkswagon. Good luck on your ratings you are going to need it :( TWILIGHT RULES AND ALL OTHERS ARE JUST FOOLS yeah that's right I said it!
PandaRanda
Posted July 28, 2008 9:08 PM
Haha Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart do look awfully ridiculous in that photo. It sure wasn't one of the best looking magazine covers I've ever seen. And hairy chests so don't do it for me. Wax perhaps? Or at least cover it up. As much as I enjoy the book, I really can't stand the two main actors in Twilight. But perhaps their 'chemistry' will come out shining bright and wonderful and everyone will be satisfied. Fingers crossed? Maybe.
NoGrumpys
Posted 7:11 AM 12/7/08
"Twilight is here, it's a little bit queer,"
I vant to suck your.....what?!
NoGrumpys
el smrtmnky
Posted 7:11 AM 12/7/08
Alexander SkarsgÄrd sure doesn't suck. grrr!
el smrtmnky
EuroDad
Posted 7:06 AM 12/7/08
Miley Cyrus' "racy" photo would fit right in, skin tone and all!
EuroDad
kookla
Posted 7:02 AM 12/7/08
So, everything old is new again?
kookla
Cultmember
Posted 6:58 AM 12/7/08
The Young Conan O'Brien Chronicles!
Cultmember
raincoaster
Posted 3:54 PM 12/7/08
That is seriously bad hair. Vampires never have fried hair in real life.
Uh, nevermind. Ignore me. I'll go back to my Chelsea Quinn Yarborough books now
raincoaster