Now You, Too, Can Lose Money Financing a Weinstein Company Film
Posted by Defamer Hollywood at 3:50 AM on July 10, 2008
The inevitable karmic payback for Fraggle Rock: The Movie is coming swift and severe at The Weinstein Company, where Harvey Weinstein is reduced to bringing in outsiders to get two of his long-delayed passion projects off the ground. Relativity Media appears ready to kick in at least half of Nine's $80 million budget, meaning the long-delayed, Daniel Day-Lewis/Nicole Kidman-starring musical will finally start shooting this fall.
But Quentin Tarntino's Inglorious Bastards, which as recently as two weeks ago was to receive the last blank check in Harvey's account, is apparently also in the market for a backer. And not just a co-producer — the Weinstein s and Lawrence Bender have that part under control — but an actual studio with actual money, writes Nikki Finke:
[O]ne of the ways that The Weinstein Co attracted investors was by hyping its creative connection to the Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill 1 & 2 writer/director who has long made a lot of money for a lot of people. But now only Harv, and not his investors, could potentially profit from the connection? Unreal. ... I hear it's gone out to Universal, Warner Bros., Paramount ... and Sony.
Right. Listen, guys — "Paramount Pictures Presents a film by Quentin Tarantino" is the worst-sounding eight-word phrase to hit Hollywood since "You like me! You really, really like me!" Even if trash day is currently the most newsworthy thing happening at TWC HQ, there must be a solution out there. Can't Harvey sell off a few of his Tonys or something? Or even his Oscar; as long as he sticks to co-producing, Scott Rudin can always buy him another one down the line. Hit Craigslist or something, seriously. Think outside the box!
- Weinstein Co. does double duty [Variety]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Hubert Cumberdale
Posted 4:47 AM 10/7/08
It makes a little sense now. Nothing to see here. As you were.
Hubert Cumberdale
Hubert Cumberdale
Posted 4:21 AM 10/7/08
This doesn't make any sense. Or maybe I'm just stupid. I think it's a little a both. What the fuck, Harvey?
Hubert Cumberdale
DrFeelgood
Posted 5:42 AM 10/7/08
QT will always find $$.
His home video $$ alone makes it a no brainer.
DrFeelgood
Cam/ron
Posted 6:22 AM 10/7/08
Why doesn't Tarantino just ink a deal with Vivid Video or Tera Patrick Productions and get on with it? He'll get a $400 million budget.
Cam/ron
Cam/ron
Posted 7:19 AM 10/7/08
@wharfrat: There wouldn't be money shots because all of the authentic, vintage 70's Swedish porn flicks lacked them, maaan.
Cam/ron
wharfrat
Posted 6:51 AM 10/7/08
Why do I think that real porn by QT would be distinctly unappealing. . .
wharfrat
LBJeffries
Posted 8:37 AM 10/7/08
I'm sure it's been said before, but Quentin Tarantino looks just like Lady Elaine Fairchild from Mr. Roger's Neighborhood to me.
Also, he looks like my aunt Maggie.
LBJeffries