Is Downtrodden Weinstein Company Paying to Play at New Showtime?
Posted by Defamer Hollywood at 2:30 AM on July 16, 2008
Disgruntled as its recent self-esteem plunge has made us, no one could realistically suggest that the Weinstein Company is what you'd call "circling the drain." Maybe "studying the drain," or even "pawning the drain," if today's latest Harvey newsflash is to be believed: The Weinsteins have locked up a deal with Showtime as the premium-cable outlet for 95 films over seven years. Starting in 2009, the agreement covers both Weinstein Company and Dimension Films releases, including the so-hot-no-one-will-claim-it Inglorious Bastards and Rob Marshall's musical Nine.
The best part, though? According to reports (excerpted after the jump) the Weinsteins are actually paying Showtime to air their product:
[I]n an unusual twist, the indie distributor apparently will make an advance "bonus" payment of as much as $100 million to the pay cable channel.As in other pay TV deals, Showtime would parcel out payments to the Weinsteins according to the performance of the various films at the domestic boxoffice — minus the prepayment, which is essentially a discount on the amount Showtime will owe the supplier.
Declining to discuss the financial terms of the deal, the Weinstein Co. co-chief Harvey Weinstein called the suggestion of a prepayment clause "rumour and innuendo" but added that in his opinion, the deal is "a game-changer" for his company.
The only game we see changing is Showtime's, which blew off Paramount, Lionsgate and MGM (the Weinsteins' original cable partner) demands three months ago and which, before yesterday, didn't have a theatrical output deal in place. That it achieved not only that, but got the distributor to pay for it, thus underwriting a good chunk of the original programming it needs to keep its carriers happy? That's awesome.
Granted, it's TWC — the $100 million is widely perceived as insurance against the day when Matt Blank's hotline to Harvey bounces back with an automated disconnection message. And regardless of whether or not Harvey pulls out the big '08-'09 he's planning — Gawker's analysis seems to suggest otherwise — Showtime will need more than Tarantino Oscar bait to fill its slate (its Viacom divorce partner CBS Films is good for roughly 30-40 projects in that time). But as marriages of convenience go, we've seen worse. Anyway, it's hard to resist the idea of the new Showtime as something of a mail-order bride. Best of luck to all!

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Losin_it
Posted 3:19 AM 16/7/08
In the far future, all of us will make it through one single day without hearing a sports cliche like "game changer", "stepping up to the plate", "get to first base", "bringing my A-game", etc.
Losin_it
Little Mintz Sunshine
Posted 4:05 AM 16/7/08
@Losin_it: I'll take that under consideration for when I become ruler (hope you don't have any issues with immediate execution for anyone using the word "wheelhouse")...but in the meantime Harv, I think if you are going to use a sports analogy, you should not look like your heart would exploded if you broke into a brisk walk.
Little Mintz Sunshine
CourageousCoward
Posted 3:57 AM 16/7/08
It's not like this is the first time Harvey's had to "pay for play."
CourageousCoward
parkslump
Posted 4:37 AM 16/7/08
Little did we know that Harv paid some over-hyped writer "a cool million" to write his rebuttal.
parkslump
unclevanya
Posted 2:02 PM 16/7/08
I wonder if Harvey just asked Lifetime to write their check out to Showtime to save time?
unclevanya