Accused Rapist Pitches Jail Ordeal as Stephen King-Meets-M. Night Shyamalan

Posted by Defamer Hollywood at 10:40 AM on July 22, 2008

Perhaps to our discredit, we had long ago relegated disgraced fashion designer/tacky Web-site proprietor Anand Jon Alexander to the quiet corners of our minds where accused serial rapists like him (59 counts, at last check) await trial. Sharon Waxman, meanwhile — who extensively interviewed AJ and pored over eight volumes of grand jury transcripts for an article in the new issue of Los Angelesacknowledges that the testimony of the aspiring models he allegedly assaulted is both "damning" and "extremely weak in places," implying that Alexander's case may not be as open-and-closed as we'd suspected once it goes to trial in September. "Anand Jon does not appear to be a nice guy," she writes. "But that is not a crime in any state."

 

At least he was nice enough to chime in with a disturbing note from jail, excerpted after the jump.

Yoga, meditation, and the love of my family and God have sustained me as I grapple with blankets that have blood stains dried in tie-dyed patterns and battle nocturnal visits from entities that include, but are not limited to, rodents and insects (that I have not even seen in the jungles of India!). How much of it is my imagination? I'm not really sure. But the whole thing feels like a Stephen King novel turned into a movie directed by M. Night Shyamalan.
A fair trial is a wonderful concept but more of a satire in my case, based on how this has been manipulated and has been anything but fair. No one besides the parties involved (traditionally "two") knows IF intimacy/sex even happened or much less if it was consensual or not. Wouldn't one call 911? Get a rape kit or at least STD testing? Would anyone continue to follow, travel, live with someone who allegedly assaulted them?

Oh, give it up, AJ — Manoj would never direct a Stephen King prison adaptation. That's Frank Darabont territory all the way.

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)

Cleaner

Posted July 23, 2008 12:57 PM

At least defamer has the balls to (sort of) admit when they may be wrong. how many of the other sites / media outlet will do the same? too many yet to be answered questions here. this trial and the events leading up to it will be reviewed in law schools for many years. the prosecution pushed the media at the outset. now it's time for the other side to get justice and their day in court.

just a thought... if the accusers are found to be lying, they should spend as much time in jail.

lola

Posted July 24, 2008 10:58 PM

its really sad that he has been punished without a trial-sitting in jail for more than a year on allegations that have no material evidence thats crazy
why did they move in as room mates?
why did they follow him from state to state to allege him later?
whole case stinks- let the man at least be given a fair chance to defend himself

mary

Posted July 24, 2008 11:00 PM

everyone is entitled to a fair trial
why is he being denied that

Post Your Comment

Defamer Australia moderates comments to avoid spam and abuse. We're looking for comments that are interesting, substantial and/or highly amusing. HTML is not accepted.

You must supply a name and your email address.