RSS Feeds
Panicked Insiders Fear For Curveless, Merely 9-Stone Catherine Zeta-Jones
Posted by Defamer Hollywood at 7:05 AM on June 6, 2008
Among those sniveling, rodent-like, British sorts who follow the weight fluctuations of actresses who look inarguably healthy, Catherine Zeta-Jones's current "condition" is approaching near-scandal levels of alarm. For example, the Daily Mail today cites a not-harrowing new collection of photos supposedly suggesting Zeta-Jones has suffered a perilous loss of curvature and, well, stone:
She's a poster-girl for gorgeous curves, but Catherine Zeta Jones appears to be in danger of losing her bombshell status. ...
The actresses weight is known to have has fluctuated over the years. Catherine, who is married to Michael Douglas, has told how she 'ate for Wales' when pregnant with her first child, Dylan, now seven.At her heaviest she weighed 13 stone. After the birth of her daughter Carys five years ago, she used a tough dance-based routine from her movie Chicago to whittle herself into shape.
Representatives for Zeta-Jones furiously challenged the reports, noting that even at her most pregnant the Oscar-winner has never tipped the scales at anything more than 11 stone. Story author "Daily Mail Reporter" insisted s/he stood by the number, though, clarifying the paper's policy that every lost curve is roughly equivalent to .87 stone and that a careful study of the photographic record would speak for itself.
- Where have your curves gone, Catherine Zeta-Jones? [Daily Mail]
Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
TryThisAtHome
Posted 7:51 AM 6/6/08
Too skinny. No butt. Even for Hollywood.
TryThisAtHome
bichon
Posted 7:28 AM 6/6/08
She may be "difficult" i.e. "a bitch" but she looks good.
bichon
Leviticus_71
Posted 7:22 AM 6/6/08
Paul Simon looks so much shorter in real life.
Leviticus_71
CourageousCoward
Posted 7:21 AM 6/6/08
I think, and I'm sure the guy in the photo would agree, that she looks great. Arms are not skinny, elbow and knee joints are not protruding, no ribs showing, still got the boobs. What's the problem?
CourageousCoward
kookla
Posted 8:50 AM 6/6/08
Enough about Zeta, what is the deal with the guy on the right? Stoned? Or he weighs a stone?
kookla
martini-shark
Posted 8:39 AM 6/6/08
If she dropped too much stone maybe she's been on the rock, (that's not to say The Rock). Dumb British Tabs, if they want to worry about dusturbing appearances look at the pics of her husband shirtless.
martini-shark
SomnambulantHobbit
Posted 8:35 AM 6/6/08
She's wearing a slimming all black outfit and standing at an ackward angle. I don't see how any one can tell a thing from that photo.
SomnambulantHobbit
Benovite
Posted 9:20 AM 6/6/08
WOOHOO DOOBIES!
Benovite
Benovite
Posted 9:18 AM 6/6/08
When I get stoned I put on more stones.
Benovite
Superawesomerad
Posted 10:03 AM 6/6/08
I don't recall her ever having much of an ass. She looks fine.
I'm more concerned about the leggings/espadrilles combination. A little too summer 2006 for my tastes.
Superawesomerad
heidiho
Posted 11:21 AM 6/6/08
@Superawesomerad: Never had much of an ass?
I have two words for you: Entrapment and lasers.
heidiho
fembot
Posted 7:32 PM 6/6/08
she looks fine - I'm impressed that at 40 she looking 20's - and doesn't appear to have had obvious work done. (from the bullpen pic last week.)
fembot
random_play
Posted 7:32 PM 6/6/08
How could you let this thread go without Sly & the Family Stone?
+ Watch video
random_play
TedCopacabana
Posted 2:50 AM 7/6/08
They're making life sized bobbleheads now!
TedCopacabana
TheQuestion
Posted 5:08 AM 7/6/08
@heidiho: Complete agreement! That movie was nothing short of bone-inducing. Hell, even that old grump Connery looked impressed.
TheQuestion