Guillermo del Toro Would Sooner Burn Down Hollywood than Make Second 'Hobbit' Film
Posted by Defamer Hollywood at 3:15 AM on June 28, 2008
We know pretty much everyone in the world except a few drones at Defamer HQ can't seem to wait for noted genre waffler Guillermo del Toro's take on The Hobbit, previously reported as a pair of films he'd make over several years in New Zealand with producer Peter Jackson at his side. But last night at the LA Film Festival, where his Hellboy II will premiere Saturday night, del Toro kicked Middle-Earth off its axis by hinting that he wasn't beholden to a second film at all. Not only that, but he confessed an antisocial streak suggesting he might kill the project just to watch it bleed.
And while we think that fantastic idea is a second film in itself, read on to see why Tolkien geeks and studio suits alike may be shuddering this morning.
"We believe there is a second movie," del Toro said during a discussion at the Majestic Crest. "If there isn't, there will not be. If we find it, we will shoot it, but by God, if we do not find it, we will not shoot it. I am anxious to shoot the book, and I'm willing and able to dedicate myself to shooting the [second film]."
Not very reassuring, we don't think — especially for MGM, which needs the prestige and profit of a Hobbit two-fer, like, yesterday. It's trickier than it sounds, though; the second film, which would apparently bridge the gap between The Hobbit and The Fellowship of the Ring, can only draw on the novels to which Jackson holds the rights. The rest of the background or ancillary literature (and there's a lot) is off-limits. "In the four books that are in the domain of the copyright, there are appendices and ideas and things that can be traced without risk," del Toro said. "But I have to be careful not to overstep. We believe there is a way to create this film and make it interesting, but it's too early."
Whatever. With del Toro or without him, there's too much at stake not to shoot both films, but either way, the filmmaker later alluded to how difficult he'd love to make things for the establishment. "Look, if I hadn't been a filmmaker, I would have loved to be a bank robber," he said. "I hate institutions. I hate banks. I wish they'd burn to the fucking ground. I hate lawyers. I hate anyone who fucks us every day and wants us to thank them. I used to want to plan bank robberies. I was fascinated by Rififi or any bank-heist movies. You give me Ocean's 11 or Rififi or whatever you want — as long as they're fucking a banker.
"And in my mind, those [robberies] would be creative endeavours, you know?" he continued. "They would need to plan them like a movie shoot, and they would organize a crew, and they'd probably make more money. I do have antisocial impulses, especially toward institutions, but I channel them toward my movies. People who like my movies would agree." Great! We look forward to seeing what he does with his flamethrower.
[Photo Credit: Jeffrey Wells]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Juancho
Posted 4:41 AM 28/6/08
I think he may have gone back on the vegetarian diet, he's done lost his marbles.
Juancho
nick_r
Posted 4:22 AM 28/6/08
When did Tarantino start writing his interview dialogue for him?
nick_r
el smrtmnky
Posted 4:10 AM 28/6/08
Pan's Day Afternoon
el smrtmnky
CourageousCoward
Posted 3:55 AM 28/6/08
"I don't want to shoot any film that's not found or bridged; find any film that's not bridged or shot; bridge a film that's not shot or found.
Bank-robbing. Sport of the future."
CourageousCoward
Old No.7
Posted 3:45 AM 28/6/08
"If there isn't, there will not be. If we find it, we will shoot it, but by God, if we do not find it, we will not shoot it."
You're a regular Yogi fuckin' Berra, aren't you?
Old No.7
Cultmember
Posted 5:58 AM 28/6/08
When is Del Toro gonna stop dicking around and direct "At the Mountains of Madness"? We were promised giant albino electric penguins and we're gonna get them.
Cultmember
Grand_Marquis
Posted 6:52 AM 28/6/08
Exactly. In fact, if he fucks over Bilbo in favor of Cthulhu, that'd be all right with me.
Grand_Marquis
raincoaster
Posted 7:54 AM 28/6/08
Maaan, I would crawl through a pack of shoggoths to see that! The only decent Cthulhu Mythos movie is In The Mouth of Madness(?), that one with Sam Neill.
raincoaster
Al_Pastor
Posted 8:02 AM 28/6/08
IN THE MOUTH OF MADNESS is underrated
Al_Pastor
Cacafuego
Posted 9:29 AM 28/6/08
@raincoaster:
DAGON by Stuart Gordon was a better-than-expected adaptation of SHADOW OVER INNSMOUTH. And FROM BEYOND is a hoot, assuming you can find it. And the RESURECTED is a pretty good version of CHARLES DEXTER WARD. But most of the really good Lovecraft movies are more influenced by his work, rather than straight-out adaptations. EVIL DEAD, for example, or IN THE MOUTH OF MADNESS or QUARTERMASS & THE PIT, or Carpenter's THE THING.
Cacafuego
raincoaster
Posted 5:08 PM 28/6/08
From Beyond is a great movie to watch drunk, but I wouldn't call it a classic.
The Thing, though, IS a classic. I'd forgotten that one.
Dagon...that's not the one based on the book that came out in the Sixties about the writer who gets drawn into the cult and eventually sacrificed to Dagon, is it? I have that book and it's inspired by Shadow, and in the Mythos, but also very different. Would be a horrible movie, I'm thinking, because nothing much happens except the guy's life slipping away and then right at the end he realizes all these nutters are talking about a real god, the god appears, and he dies.
raincoaster
raincoaster
Posted 10:31 PM 28/6/08
@raincoaster: Oops.
SPOILERS!
BTW in HP Lovecraft, the god always appears and the good guys get eaten or driven mad.
raincoaster
aspiringexpatriate
Posted 7:31 PM 29/6/08
He can't even use the War of the Ring stuff? HAHA. No second movie. Not enough material. That's funny.
aspiringexpatriate
Cacafuego
Posted 6:47 AM 30/6/08
@raincoaster: No, DAGON is a pretty tight adaptation of SHADOW OVER INNSMOUTH, just as I said, but set on the Coast of Spain, not Maine. The change in locale isn't that big a deal. They changed some of the story, to work in a Deep Ones-style 'mermaid' who the protagonist is drawn to, but it makes sense in the long run.
FROM BEYOND is classic, but you have to be a lot-less fanboy tight-assed about what that term means.
To my knowledge, it is the first film to coherently illustrate the basic Lovecraftian principle that drives the Cthulhu Mythos: that There Are Things Out There that We Can't See And Can't See Us, Most Of The Time, Thank God.
THE MIST is a good Lovecraftian-style movie, too.
Cacafuego