<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sam Newman-gate: Advertiser Boycott Encouraged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/05/sam_newmangate_advertiser_boycott_encouraged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/05/sam_newmangate_advertiser_boycott_encouraged/</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:22:09 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elanor</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/05/sam_newmangate_advertiser_boycott_encouraged/comment-page-1/#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>Elanor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 06:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/05/sam_newmangate_advertiser_boycott_encouraged.html#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It really bothers me whenever my views intersect with those of Women&#039;s Forum Australia, because I&#039;ve come to believe that WFA has whiffy politics and presents itself deceptively. They&#039;re sometimes quite strong and useful in highlighting degrading media issues for women, but are a bit less forthright about being an anti-abortion organisation - which they call advocating for &#039;real choice&#039;. I went to the launch of their report &quot;Faking It&quot; about the sexualisation of women in the media, and came away feeling quite sick and misled, because a) reading through my showbag of WFA reading materials I found that one of their mission statements is to advocate for &quot;women&#039;s right to be mothers&quot;, b)I never expected to have to sit through an &#039;abstinence education&#039; presentation at an apparently feminist event, and c) I never expected to be in the same room as Steve Fielding at an apparently feminist event. Just saying, WFA creep me out.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really bothers me whenever my views intersect with those of Women&#8217;s Forum Australia, because I&#8217;ve come to believe that WFA has whiffy politics and presents itself deceptively. They&#8217;re sometimes quite strong and useful in highlighting degrading media issues for women, but are a bit less forthright about being an anti-abortion organisation &#8211; which they call advocating for &#8216;real choice&#8217;. I went to the launch of their report &#8220;Faking It&#8221; about the sexualisation of women in the media, and came away feeling quite sick and misled, because a) reading through my showbag of WFA reading materials I found that one of their mission statements is to advocate for &#8220;women&#8217;s right to be mothers&#8221;, b)I never expected to have to sit through an &#8216;abstinence education&#8217; presentation at an apparently feminist event, and c) I never expected to be in the same room as Steve Fielding at an apparently feminist event. Just saying, WFA creep me out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/05/sam_newmangate_advertiser_boycott_encouraged/comment-page-1/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 04:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/05/sam_newmangate_advertiser_boycott_encouraged.html#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;get over it, gee focus on kevin rudd &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get over it, gee focus on kevin rudd </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
