The Food Network Don’t Want A Motor In The Back Of Nigella Lawson’s Honda
Between all the too-hairy, too-skinny, too-mental coverage womankind is getting in the media these days, you’d be forgiven for thinking that there are better places to be than in the spotlight. And now it seems even sextastic television chefs – i.e., people who are generally accepted as being able to eat FOOD, as opposed to the sunlight and roasted almonds that the other female stars are served up – aren’t immune to the exacting pressure of waistlines and bum sizes.
Evidently TV chef Nigella Lawson, she of the finger-licking-goodness and dangerous curves, has been deemed too “fat” for US televisions.
The New York Post said: “Our spies at the Food Network say Nigella has way overeaten.“The result is a butt like a horse.
“Her director is now doing back flips to not show her below the waist.”
A Food Network spokesman denied any filming changes.
While we’re not entirely sure why they would need to film Nigella’s bum in the first place (other than to revel in its wondrousness, of course), we can’t help but issue a world weary grooooaaaan when we read about things like this.
Yes, Nigella has traded on her appearance/sex appeal, but come on, dudes – she’s a chef. She’s not America’s Next Top Model.
Comments
And she’s hot! Even if she is a ridiculous over-the-top upper-class Charles-Saatchi-marrying twit, I’d go her any day over these ‘top models’ they keep ‘discovering’. Ack.
And why not discuss Emirl Lagasse who has gotten quite hefty or Ina Garten. This is just left of ridiculous. What is wrong with cooking and eating. I would rather watch a good cook than see the other half of the Food Network Hosts. I did say host not cooks.