<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breaking Report Confirms AWOL Child Star &#8216;Mama Dakota&#8217; is Safe, Still Working</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/03/breaking_report_confirms_awol_child_star_mama_dakota_is_safe_still_working-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/03/breaking_report_confirms_awol_child_star_mama_dakota_is_safe_still_working-2/</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:36:06 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Mark Pilling</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/03/breaking_report_confirms_awol_child_star_mama_dakota_is_safe_still_working-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2750</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Mark Pilling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2008/03/breaking_report_confirms_awol_child_star_mama_dakota_is_safe_still_working-2.html#comment-2750</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, Dakota&#039;s disgrace is apparently only beginning.  Of the three films she&#039;s made since &quot;Hounddog&quot;; one was violent and exploitive, the next was a sci-fi potboiler and the last was an indifferent &quot;abused child&quot; melodrama which was filmed from the same studio as &quot;Hounddog&quot; and included most of the same technical crew.  All were cheap, base-pay productions.  Now, with a newly re-edited &quot;Hounddog&quot; threating to hit theaters this summer, her nightmare of Sundance 2007 looms anew.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mama Dakota?  Ask Joy Fanning, her real mama, about that one.  She&#039;s the one most responsible for denying her own daughter a decent childhood and, for profit&#039;s sake, turning her from the most loved kid on Earth into the youngest-ever screen tramp in Hollywood history.  Even Lindsey Lohan and Britney Spears weren&#039;t subjected to anything like &quot;Hounddog&quot; as children.  Look at them now and imagine the likely fate of Dakota Fanning... even earlier than they.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Dakota&#8217;s disgrace is apparently only beginning.  Of the three films she&#8217;s made since &#8220;Hounddog&#8221;; one was violent and exploitive, the next was a sci-fi potboiler and the last was an indifferent &#8220;abused child&#8221; melodrama which was filmed from the same studio as &#8220;Hounddog&#8221; and included most of the same technical crew.  All were cheap, base-pay productions.  Now, with a newly re-edited &#8220;Hounddog&#8221; threating to hit theaters this summer, her nightmare of Sundance 2007 looms anew.</p>
<p>Mama Dakota?  Ask Joy Fanning, her real mama, about that one.  She&#8217;s the one most responsible for denying her own daughter a decent childhood and, for profit&#8217;s sake, turning her from the most loved kid on Earth into the youngest-ever screen tramp in Hollywood history.  Even Lindsey Lohan and Britney Spears weren&#8217;t subjected to anything like &#8220;Hounddog&#8221; as children.  Look at them now and imagine the likely fate of Dakota Fanning&#8230; even earlier than they.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
