<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prospect Of US &#8216;Kath &amp; Kim&#8217; Is Giving Us Horrible Nightmares In Advance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv/</link>
	<description>Celebrity Gossip and Pop Culture from Australia and Hollywood</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:08:06 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M Hackett</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv/comment-page-1/#comment-4064</link>
		<dc:creator>M Hackett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv.html#comment-4064</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Kath &amp; Kim, from its very beginning refers to an Australian civilization and culture. Kath and Kim as characters are based on sketches of the original girls that played Kath &amp; Kim. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Transplanting the series to the US cultural context is impossible without a total and complete re-write of each episode. Each rewrite would have to be done to a point where each episode has little or nothing to do with the script that it originated from. In essence, each episode will not be Kath &amp; Kim at all -- just merely an exercise in purest forms of black propaganda broadcasting. There is no way to adapt Kath &amp; Kim to America, as it simply cannot be done. Adapting the show to New Zealand would be far easier, and more realistic -- for cultural reasons that are mostly not understood by Americans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is a 99% probability that the series will not get high ratings at all, as the original series was initially kept alive by the ABC TV network in Australia for Season 1 and some of Season 2. Kath &amp; Kim, as a style of sitcom is still unique to Australasia and likely not to be duplicated in the rest of the world for some years into the future.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The network that is choosing to do this series from scratch would have been better off buying the original Kath &amp; Kim series and running it stragit. In essence the network is just wasting people&#039;s time and its own money.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kath &#038; Kim, from its very beginning refers to an Australian civilization and culture. Kath and Kim as characters are based on sketches of the original girls that played Kath &#038; Kim. </p>
<p>Transplanting the series to the US cultural context is impossible without a total and complete re-write of each episode. Each rewrite would have to be done to a point where each episode has little or nothing to do with the script that it originated from. In essence, each episode will not be Kath &#038; Kim at all &#8212; just merely an exercise in purest forms of black propaganda broadcasting. There is no way to adapt Kath &#038; Kim to America, as it simply cannot be done. Adapting the show to New Zealand would be far easier, and more realistic &#8212; for cultural reasons that are mostly not understood by Americans.</p>
<p>There is a 99% probability that the series will not get high ratings at all, as the original series was initially kept alive by the ABC TV network in Australia for Season 1 and some of Season 2. Kath &#038; Kim, as a style of sitcom is still unique to Australasia and likely not to be duplicated in the rest of the world for some years into the future.</p>
<p>The network that is choosing to do this series from scratch would have been better off buying the original Kath &#038; Kim series and running it stragit. In essence the network is just wasting people&#8217;s time and its own money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wiz</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv/comment-page-1/#comment-4063</link>
		<dc:creator>wiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 01:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv.html#comment-4063</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Molly Shannon is da BOMB!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Molly Shannon is da BOMB!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv/comment-page-1/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 04:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv.html#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know these things have a dodgy track record but I&#039;ve always found that Molly Shannon kinda hilarious. And I know it&#039;s confounding that American TV execs seem to think their countrypeople can&#039;t handle the *bizarre* accents and cultural customs of other English speaking countries (mind you, Kath &amp; Kim is rather Oz specific), &lt;i&gt;but&lt;/i&gt; I&#039;d be kinda fascinated to see a big glossy US version of Kath &amp; Kim -- especially cuz our version is getting so close to jumping the shark.  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know these things have a dodgy track record but I&#8217;ve always found that Molly Shannon kinda hilarious. And I know it&#8217;s confounding that American TV execs seem to think their countrypeople can&#8217;t handle the *bizarre* accents and cultural customs of other English speaking countries (mind you, Kath &#038; Kim is rather Oz specific), <i>but</i> I&#8217;d be kinda fascinated to see a big glossy US version of Kath &#038; Kim &#8212; especially cuz our version is getting so close to jumping the shark.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaded</title>
		<link>http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv/comment-page-1/#comment-4061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 02:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.defamer.com.au/2007/10/prospect_of_us_kath_kim_is_giv.html#comment-4061</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What happened with Joan Cusak being interested in playing Kim?  That could have been cool, though never as good as the original.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sorry, have to defend the American version of the Office.  It&#039;s really good.  I loved the original, but once I got past the differences, I found it a really enjoyable, intelligent show.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened with Joan Cusak being interested in playing Kim?  That could have been cool, though never as good as the original.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, have to defend the American version of the Office.  It&#8217;s really good.  I loved the original, but once I got past the differences, I found it a really enjoyable, intelligent show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
